ArticleNeurology2017
Racial disparities in neurologic health care access and utilization in the United States.
Article in Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inequities in neurological care: Access to services, care gaps, and other barriers-A systematic review.European journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Disparities in Access to Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease and Proposed Interventions: A Literature Review.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2024Pooled it
- Physical Therapist Management of Parkinson Disease: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Physical Therapy Association.Physical therapy · 2022Guideline
- Socio-Economic Disparities in Access to Diagnostic Neuroimaging Services in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Telephone-based depression self-management in Hispanic adults with epilepsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Trial
- One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2019Trial
- The SEQUINS scholars program: a longitudinal curriculum to advance brain health equity education among early career trainees.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Equity in Neurotoxicity Care in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.Seminars in neurology · 2026Article
- The Ecology of Care in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Article
- A comparison of dementia-free life expectancy estimates across competing algorithmic classifications: new knowledge and considerations from the health and retirement study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Epidemiology of unspecified degenerative nervous system disorders: mortality trends via CDC WONDER (1999-2025).BMC neurology · 2026Article
- National mortality trends in polyneuropathies and other disorders of the peripheral nervous system in the United States, 1999-2023: a CDC WONDER database analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of an interactive, iterative zoom-based anti-racism course for academic neurology faculty.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Disparities in imaging and management of multiple sclerosis: a review.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- The role of social context in cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes in epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Higher risk, lower reimbursement: medicare payment paradox in cranial neurosurgery.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Changes in Healthcare Utilization Patterns and Outcomes for an Acute Cerebrovascular Events Medicare Cohort: 2018-2022.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Article
- Gaps in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Patients with Brain Tumors in the United States: A State-of-the-Art Review.Cancers · 2025Review
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate racial and ethnic differences in the utilization of neurologic care across a wide range of neurologic conditions in the United States.
methodsWe analyzed nationally representative data from the 2006-2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), including information on demographics, patient-reported health conditions, neurology visit rates, and costs. Using diagnostic codes, we identified persons with any self-identified neurologic disorder except back pain, as well as 5 subgroups (Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, headache, cerebrovascular disease, and epilepsy). To assess disparities in neurologic care utilization, we performed logistic regression analyses of outpatient department neurologic care visit rates and expenditures for each racial ethnic group controlling for age, sex, health status, socioeconomic characteristics, and geographic region of care.
resultsOf the 279,103 MEPS respondents, 16,936 (6%) self-reported a neurologic condition; 5,890 (2%) received a total of 13,685 outpatient neurology visits. Black participants were nearly 30% less likely to see an outpatient neurologist (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.81) relative to their white counterparts, even after adjustment for demographic, insurance, and health status differences. Hispanic participants were 40% less likely to see an outpatient neurologist (OR 0.61, CI 0.54-0.69). Among participants with known neurologic conditions, blacks were more likely to be cared for in the emergency department, to have more hospital stays, and to have higher per capita inpatient expenditures than their white counterparts.
conclusionsOur findings highlight racial and ethnic inequalities in the utilization of neurologic care in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.