Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515316›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

DNA-damage-induced degradation of EXO1 exonuclease limits DNA end resection to ensure accurate DNA repair.

Nozomi Tomimatsu, Bipasha Mukherjee, Janelle Louise Harris, Francesca Ludovica Boffo, Molly Catherine Hardebeck, Patrick Ryan Potts, Kum Kum Khanna, Sandeep Burma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNA repair-associated nucleases induce double-strand breaks following sequential exposure to UVA1 and UVB.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Key molecular DNA damage responses of human cells to radiation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  17. HemaSphere · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nozomi TomimatsuFrom the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Bipasha MukherjeeFrom the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Janelle Louise HarrisSignal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia.
Francesca Ludovica BoffoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy, and.
Molly Catherine HardebeckFrom the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Patrick Ryan PottsDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105.
Kum Kum KhannaSignal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia.
Sandeep BurmaFrom the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, sandeep.burma@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUFederico II University Hospital · ITSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of GBM radioresistance and strategies for radiosensitizationR01CA149461 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BURMA, SANDEEP · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Mechanisms of EXO1 regulation in response to radiation-induced DNA damageR01CA197796 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BURMA, SANDEEP · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Augmented homologous recombination as a mechanism of acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastomaR21CA202403 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BURMA, SANDEEP · 2016 to 2017
$388k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149461NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197796NCI NIH HHS R21 CA202403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End resection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to generate 3'-single-stranded DNA facilitates DSB repair via error-free homologous recombination (HR) while stymieing repair by the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Activation of DNA end resection involves phosphorylation of the 5' to 3' exonuclease EXO1 by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-like kinases ATM (ataxia telangiectasia-mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) and by the cyclin-dependent kinases 1 and 2. After activation, EXO1 must also be restrained to prevent over-resection that is known to hamper optimal HR and trigger global genomic instability. However, mechanisms by which EXO1 is restrained are still unclear. Here, we report that EXO1 is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system soon after DSB induction in human cells. ATR inhibition attenuated DNA-damage-induced EXO1 degradation, indicating that ATR-mediated phosphorylation of EXO1 targets it for degradation. In accord with these results, EXO1 became resistant to degradation when its SQ motifs required for ATR-mediated phosphorylation were mutated. We show that upon the induction of DNA damage, EXO1 is ubiquitinated by a member of the Skp1-Cullin1-F-box (SCF) family of ubiquitin ligases in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Importantly, expression of degradation-resistant EXO1 resulted in hyper-resection, which attenuated both NHEJ and HR and severely compromised DSB repair resulting in chromosomal instability. These findings indicate that the coupling of EXO1 activation with its eventual degradation is a timing mechanism that limits the extent of DNA end resection for accurate DNA repair.

Indexed as

DNA DamageProteolysisAmino Acid MotifsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsChromosomal InstabilityDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesEnzyme ActivationExodeoxyribonucleasesHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansPhosphorylationUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanATR protein, humanDNA Repair EnzymesEXO1 protein, humanExodeoxyribonucleasesUbiquitin-Protein LigasesATRchromosomesDNA-damage responseDNA double-strand breakDNA end resectionDNA repairEXO1Genomic stabilityhomologous recombination

Identifiers

PMID28515316
PMCPMC5491765
OpenAlexW2614487508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.