Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515675›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Utility of intraoral stents in external beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Hiroshi Doi, Masao Tanooka, Toshihisa Ishida, Kuniyasu Moridera, Kenji Ichimiya, Kazuo Tarutani, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Masayuki Fujiwara, Hiromitsu Kishimoto, Norihiko Kamikonya

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Intraoral stent for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D technology: an integrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of a customisable 3D-printed intra-oral stent for head-and-neck radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Are intraoral customized stents still necessary in the era of Highly Conformal Radiotherapy for Head & Neck cancer? Case series and literature review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi DoiDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Masao TanookaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Toshihisa IshidaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Kuniyasu MorideraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Kenji IchimiyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Kazuo TarutaniDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Kazuhiro KitajimaDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Masayuki FujiwaraDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiromitsu KishimotoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Norihiko KamikonyaDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to assess the utility and stability of intraoral stent during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

backgroundThe benefits of intraoral stents in radiotherapy are unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed 386 setup errors in 12 patients who received IMRT for head and neck cancers without intraoral stents (intraoral stent [-]) and 183 setup errors in 6 patients who received IMRT with intraoral stents (intraoral stent [+]). All patients were matched according to the immobilization method (masks and boards). Setup errors were measured as the distance from the initial setup based on the marking on the skin and mask to the corrected position based on bone matching on cone beam computed tomography.

resultsThe mean interfractional setup errors in the right-left, craniocaudal, anterior-posterior (AP), and three-dimensional (3D) directions were -0.33, 0.08, -0.25, and 2.75 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and -0.37, 0.24, -0.63, and 2.42 mm in the intraoral stent (+) group, respectively (

conclusionSetup errors can be significantly reduced in the AP and 3D-directions by using intraoral stents.

Indexed as

Bite block immobilizationHead and neck cancerIntensity modulated radiation therapyRadiotherapySetup error

Identifiers

PMID28515675
PMCPMC5425345
OpenAlexW2612518696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.