Evidence mapPaperPMID 28520522Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2017

Perceptions of Statin Discontinuation among Patients with Life-Limiting Illness.

Jennifer Tjia, Jean S Kutner, Christine S Ritchie, Patrick J Blatchford, Rachael E Bennett Kendrick, Maryjo Prince-Paul, Tamara J Somers, Mary Lynn McPherson, Jeff A Sloan, Amy P Abernethy and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT01415934. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01415934 nacompleted

Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuing vs. Discontinuing Statins

Ran2011Enrolled381Registered outcomes1Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Palliative MedicineArmsdiscontinue statins
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Deprescribing for patients nearing end of life: views, barriers and facilitators of palliative care patients, carers and nurses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Landscape and Future Directions of Deprescribing and Polypharmacy Practices in Jordan.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
  11. Perspectives on deprescribing in palliative care.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deprescribing in Palliative Cancer Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deprescribing in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer Tjia1 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester, Massachusetts.
Jean S Kutner2 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Christine S Ritchie3 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine , San Francisco, California.
Patrick J Blatchford4 Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Rachael E Bennett Kendrick5 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Maryjo Prince-Paul6 Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.
Tamara J Somers7 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.
Mary Lynn McPherson8 Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeff A Sloan9 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Amy P Abernethy10 Flatiron Health , New York, New York.
Jon P Furuno11 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy , Portland, Oregon.

Funding

NINR NIH HHS U24 NR014637NINR NIH HHS U2C NR014637NINR NIH HHS UC4 NR012584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal management of chronic medications for patients with life-limiting illness is uncertain. Medication deprescribing may improve outcomes in this population, but patient concerns regarding deprescribing are unclear.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to quantify the perceived benefits and concerns of statin discontinuation among patients with life-limiting illness.

designBaseline data from a multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial of statin discontinuation were used. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Cognitively intact participants with a life expectancy of 1-12 months receiving statin medications for primary or secondary prevention were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to a 9-item questionnaire addressing patient concerns about discontinuing statins were collected. We used Pearson chi-square tests to compare responses by primary life-limiting diagnosis (cancer, cardiovascular disease, other).

resultsOf 297 eligible participants, 58% had cancer, 8% had cardiovascular disease, and 30% other primary diagnoses. Mean (standard deviation) age was 72 (11) years. Fewer than 5% of participants expressed concern that statin deprescribing indicated physician abandonment. About one in five participants reported being told to take statins for the rest of their life (18%) or feeling that discontinuation represented prior wasted effort (18%). Many participants reported benefits of stopping statins, including spending less money on medications (63%), potentially stopping other medications (34%), and having a better quality of life (25%). More participants with cardiovascular disease as a primary diagnosis perceived that quality-of-life benefits related to statin discontinuation (52%) than participants with cancer (27%) or noncardiovascular disease diagnoses (27%) [p = 0.034].

conclusionFew participants expressed concerns about discontinuing statins; many perceived potential benefits. Cardiovascular disease patients perceived greater potential positive impact from statin discontinuation.

Indexed as

Withholding TreatmentAgedCardiovascular DiseasesChronic DiseaseDecision MakingFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient PreferenceQuality of LifeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsdeprescribingmedication discontinuationstatins

Identifiers

PMID28520522
PMCPMC5647503

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.