Evidence mapPaperPMID 28523441Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Progress in the Presence of Failure: Updates in Chronic Systolic Heart Failure Management.

Katie M Murphy, Julie L Rosenthal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immune Modulation in Heart Failure: the Promise of Novel Biologics.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie M MurphyMayo Clinic Phoenix, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
Julie L RosenthalMayo Clinic Phoenix, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. rosenthal.julie@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe therapeutic heart failure armamentarium has evolved from drugs to transplantation to devices through further understanding of its complex pathophysiology and pathogenesis. Current medications capitalize on our evolving understanding of the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems that subsequently promote both beneficial and maladaptive responses that ultimately yield a decrease in cardiac function. Despite these advancements, the prevalence of heart failure continues to rise and carries a significant burden on our patients and health care system. This presents a clinical dilemma on how best to care for a growing, complex, and heterogeneous cohort. Ideal treatments should decrease morbidity and mortality while providing an improvement in quality of life and functional capacity. New interventions will continue to become incorporated into everyday practice, but awareness and prevention should remain the mainstay followed by optimization of guideline-directed therapies. It is equally important to individually tailor our therapeutic approach. While strategies to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction continue to advance, our understanding of how best to treat specific etiologies remain in question. This review will focus on current and proposed novel interventions for the management of chronic, systolic heart failure including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, I

Indexed as

ARNIHeart failureIf antagonistsManagementPotassium bindersSGLT2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28523441
OpenAlexW2615731813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.