Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526361›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017

Recruitment, Enrollment, and Response of Parent-Adolescent Dyads in the FLASHE Study.

April Y Oh, Terisa Davis, Laura A Dwyer, Erin Hennessy, Tiandong Li, Amy L Yaroch, Linda C Nebeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role ofJournal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

April Y OhBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland. Electronic address: april.oh@nih.gov.
Terisa DavisWestat, Inc., Rockville, Maryland.
Laura A DwyerBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland; Cape Fox Facilities Services, Manassas, Virginia.
Erin HennessyClinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Tiandong LiWestat, Inc., Rockville, Maryland.
Amy L YarochGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, Nebraska.
Linda C NebelingBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS HHSN261201200039CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201200039I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2014, the National Cancer Institute conducted the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study (FLASHE). This parent and adolescent survey examines psychosocial; generational (parent-adolescent); and environmental (home and neighborhood) correlates of cancer-preventive behaviors, with a particular emphasis on diet and physical activity. This paper describes the FLASHE data collection methods and enrollment and response rates.

methodsFLASHE data collection methods included web-based surveys delivered to dyads of parents and their adolescent children, and deployment of accelerometers to a subset of adolescents, to achieve study goals in a nationwide study sample. The National Cancer Institute contracted with Westat, Inc. to recruit, enroll, and collect the data using a consumer opinion panel.

resultsA total of 5,027 dyads were screened for eligibility, and 1,945 (38.7%) enrolled. Of fully enrolled dyads, 85.6% of those in the Survey-Only group completed all four surveys, and 58.7% of dyads in the Motion Study group completed all surveys and were compliant with the accelerometer protocol for adolescents. The overall study response rate was 29.4%; 1,479 dyads completed all study procedures. The majority of parents were female, whereas the adolescent sample was gender balanced. Data were analyzed in 2015-2016.

conclusionsFLASHE recruited a large sample of parent-adolescent dyads. Although challenges for research in parent-adolescent dyads include enrolling a diverse sample and having multistep enrollment and consent processes, study completion rate was high among fully enrolled dyads. Future panel studies may consider approaches used in FLASHE to encourage study enrollment and completion.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorParent-Child RelationsPatient SelectionAccelerometryAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28526361
PMCPMC5505273

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.