ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017
Surveillance of Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Wrist Accelerometry.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A natural experiment to assess recess frequency on children's physical activity in Arizona (U.S.) elementary schools.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Physical Activity, Sleep, and Demographic Patterns in Alaska Native Children and Youth Living in Anaktuvuk Pass.Youth (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Differences in physical activity between weekdays and weekend days among U.S. children and adults: Cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2011-2014 data.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Association of daily and time-segmented physical activity and sedentary behaviour with mental health of school children and adolescents from rural Northeastern Ontario, Canada.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Calibration of the Online Youth Activity Profile Assessment for School-Based Applications.Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour · 2021Article
- Review of Wearable Devices and Data Collection Considerations for Connected Health.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Feasibility/acceptability of an acceptance-based therapy intervention for diverse adolescent girls with overweight/obesity.Obesity science & practice · 2021Article
- Segmented sedentary time and physical activity patterns throughout the week from wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers among children 7-12 years old.Journal of sport and health science · 2020Article
- Estimated Physical Activity in Adolescents by Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometers.Journal of physical activity & health · 2019Article
- Wrist Acceleration Cut Points for Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Youth.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2018Article
- Understanding and Interpreting Error in Physical Activity Data: Insights from the FLASHE Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Calibration and Validation of the Youth Activity Profile: The FLASHE Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Recruitment, Enrollment, and Response of Parent-Adolescent Dyads in the FLASHE Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- The FLASHE Study: Survey Development, Dyadic Perspectives, and Participant Characteristics.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate tracking of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to advance public health, but little is known about how to interpret wrist-worn accelerometer data. This study compares youth estimates of SB and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) obtained using raw and count-based processing methods.
methodsData were collected between April and October 2014 for the National Cancer Institute's Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study: a cross-sectional Internet-based study of youth/family cancer prevention behaviors. A subsample of 628 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+ on the wrist for 7 days. In 2015-2016, SB and MVPA time were calculated from raw data using R-package GGIR and from activity counts data using published cutpoints (Crouter and Chandler). Estimates were compared across age, sex, and weight status to examine the impact of processing methods on behavioral outcomes.
resultsActiGraph data were available for 408 participants. Large differences in SB and MVPA time were observed between processing methods, but age and gender patterns were similar. Younger children (aged 12-14 years) had lower sedentary time and greater MVPA time (p-values <0.05) than older children (aged 15-17 years), consistent across methods. The proportion of youth with ≥60 minutes of MVPA/day was highest with the Crouter methods (~50%) and lowest with GGIR (~0%).
conclusionsConclusions about youth PA and SB are influenced by the wrist-worn accelerometer data processing method. Efforts to harmonize processing methods are needed to promote standardization and facilitate reporting of monitor-based PA data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.