Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28532509›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis.

Justin Presseau, Brittany Mutsaers, Ahmed A Al-Jaishi, Janet Squires, Christopher W McIntyre, Amit X Garg, Manish M Sood, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Major outcomes with personalized dialysate TEMPerature (MyTEMP) investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02628366 (Major Outcomes With Personalized Dialysate TEMPerature), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02628366 nacompletednot on this map

Major Outcomes With Personalized Dialysate TEMPerature: Pragmatic, Registry-Based, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2017 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsKidney Diseases, End-Stage Kidney Disease, HemodialysisArmsPersonalized Dialysate Temperature
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada. jpresseau@ohri.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-0703
Brittany MutsaersClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.
Ahmed A Al-JaishiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Janet SquiresClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.
Christopher W McIntyreDivision of Nephrology, Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Amit X GargDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Manish M SoodClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.
Major outcomes with personalized dialysate TEMPerature (MyTEMP) investigators
University of Ottawa · CAWestern University · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing the treatment arm of a clinical trial often requires changes to healthcare practices. Barriers to such changes may undermine the delivery of the treatment making it more likely that the trial will demonstrate no treatment effect. The 'Major outcomes with personalized dialysate temperature' (MyTEMP) is a cluster-randomised trial to be conducted in 84 haemodialysis centres across Ontario, Canada to investigate whether there is a difference in major outcomes with an individualized dialysis temperature (IDT) of 0.5 °C below a patient's body temperature measured at the beginning of each haemodialysis session, compared to a standard dialysis temperature of 36.5 °C. To inform how to deploy the IDT across many haemodialysis centres, we assessed haemodialysis physicians' and nurses' perceived barriers and enablers to IDT use.

methodsWe developed two topic guides using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to assess perceived barriers and enablers to IDT ordering and IDT setting (physician and nurse behaviours, respectively). We recruited a purposive sample of haemodialysis physicians and nurses from across Ontario and conducted in-person or telephone interviews. We used directed content analysis to double-code transcribed utterances into TDF domains, and inductive thematic analysis to develop themes.

resultsWe interviewed nine physicians and nine nurses from 11 Ontario haemodialysis centres. We identified seven themes of potential barriers and facilitators to implementing IDTs: (1) awareness of clinical guidelines and how IDT fits with local policies (knowledge; goals), (2) benefits and motivation to use IDT (beliefs about consequences; optimism; reinforcement; intention; goals), (3) alignment of IDTs with usual practice and roles (social/professional role and identity; nature of the behaviour; beliefs about capabilities), (4) thermometer availability/accuracy and dialysis machine characteristics (environmental context and resources), (5) impact on workload (beliefs about consequences; beliefs about capabilities), (6) patient comfort (behavioural regulation; beliefs about consequences; emotion), and (7) forgetting to prescribe or set IDT (memory, attention, decision making processes; emotion).

conclusionsThere are anticipatable barriers to changing healthcare professionals' behaviours to effectively deliver an intervention within a randomised clinical trial. A behaviour change framework can help to systematically identify such barriers to inform better delivery and evaluation of the treatment, therefore potentially increasing the fidelity of the intervention to increase the internal validity of the trial. These findings will be used to optimise the delivery of IDT in the MyTEMP trial and demonstrate how this approach can be used to plan intervention delivery in other clinical trials.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02628366 . Registered November 16 2015.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeModels, PsychologicalTemperatureBody TemperatureGuideline AdherenceHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMotivationNephrologistsNursesOntarioPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'Renal DialysisDialysate temperatureHaemodialysisTheoretical Domains FrameworkTrial implementation

Identifiers

PMID28532509
PMCPMC5440991
OpenAlexW2617900652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.