Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577680›Full record

Trial reportAmerican heart journal2017

Results of a phase I/II multi-center investigation of udenafil in adolescents after fontan palliation.

David J Goldberg, Victor Zak, Bryan H Goldstein, Shan Chen, Michelle S Hamstra, Elizabeth A Radojewski, Eileen Maunsell, Seema Mital, Shaji C Menon, Kurt R Schumacher and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Results of the FUEL Trial.Circulation · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

David J GoldbergDivision of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: goldbergda@email.chop.edu.
Victor ZakNew England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA.
Bryan H GoldsteinDivision of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Shan ChenNew England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA.
Michelle S HamstraDivision of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Elizabeth A RadojewskiDivision of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Eileen MaunsellNew England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA.
Seema MitalDivision of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Shaji C MenonDivision of Cardiology, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT.
Kurt R SchumacherDivision of Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
R Mark PayneDivision of Cardiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN.
Mario StylianouDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Jonathan R KaltmanDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Tina M deVriesConsultant to Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.
James L YeagerConsultant to Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.
Stephen M ParidonDivision of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Pediatric Heart Network Investigators
New England Research Institutes · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USC. S. Mott Children's Hospital · USHospital for Sick Children · CAPrimary Children's Hospital · USRiley Hospital for Children · USSickKids Foundation · CA

Funding

Pediatric Heart network DCCU10HL068270 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MILLER, JULIE ELAINE, TRACHTENBERG, FELICIA LYNN · 2011 to 2016
$44.9M
Ventricular Volumes and Varability (VVV)U01HL068270 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI SLEEPER, LYNN A · 2001 to 2010
$40.3M
MIS-C Program: Data Coordinating Center for the Pediatric Heart Network MIS-C ProgramU24HL135691 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MILLER, JULIE ELAINE, TRACHTENBERG, FELICIA LYNN · 2017 to 2024
$37.9M
Pediatric Heart Network Clinical Research Centers - Boston Children's HospitalUG1HL135685 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI NEWBURGER, JANE W., TRIEDMAN, JOHN K · 2017 to 2023
$2.7M
Pediatric Heart Network Prairieland ConsortiumUG1HL135678 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI CNOTA, JAMES, PAYNE, RONALD MARK · 2017 to 2023
$2.4M
Pediatric Heart Network - Utah CenterUG1HL135646 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MINICH, L. LUANN, WILLIAMS, RICHARD VINCENT · 2017 to 2023
$2.3M
Pediatric Heart Network - The Hospital for Sick Children, TorontoUG1HL135680 · NHLBI · HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHLDRN (TORONTO) · PI MCCRINDLE, BRIAN W, MITAL, SEEMA · 2017 to 2023
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL068270NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL068270NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL135691NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135646NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135678NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135680NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes.

objectivesThis phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan.

methodsA 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five.

resultsThe trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts.

conclusionsUdenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.

Indexed as

Fontan ProcedureAdolescentBenzenesulfonamidesCardiac OutputDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart VentriclesHumansMalePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPostoperative CarePulmonary CirculationBenzenesulfonamidesPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesudenafil

Identifiers

PMID28577680
PMCPMC5458626
OpenAlexW2592633990

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.