Trial reportAmerican heart journal2017
Results of a phase I/II multi-center investigation of udenafil in adolescents after fontan palliation.
Trial report in American heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary vasodilator therapy after the Fontan procedure: a meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Results of the FUEL Trial.Circulation · 2020Trial
- Article
- Collaborating to Improve Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease: The Pediatric Heart Network Experience.Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Arginine-NO metabolites are associated with morbidity in single ventricle infants undergoing stage 2 palliation.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Pulmonary vascular disease in Fontan circulation-is there a rationale for pulmonary vasodilator therapies?Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Review
- Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: Definitions, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Comprehensive Physiology · 2021Article
- Response by Goldberg et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Results of the FUEL Trial".Circulation · 2020Article
- Heart failure in single right ventricle congenital heart disease: physiological and molecular considerations.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Review
- Phosphodiesterase-5 Is Elevated in Failing Single Ventricle Myocardium and Affects Cardiomyocyte Remodeling In Vitro.Circulation. Heart failure · 2018Article
- Design and rationale of the Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) trial.American heart journal · 2018Review
- Effects of the Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) Inhibitors, Avanafil and Zaprinast, on Bone Remodeling and Oxidative Damage in a Rat Model of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.Medical science monitor basic research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes.
objectivesThis phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan.
methodsA 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five.
resultsThe trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts.
conclusionsUdenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.