Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28588304›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2017

Plasma FGF21 levels in obese patients undergoing energy-restricted diets or bariatric surgery: a marker of metabolic stress?

A B Crujeiras, D Gomez-Arbelaez, M A Zulet, M C Carreira, I Sajoux, D de Luis, A I Castro, J Baltar, I Baamonde, A Sueiro and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

A B CrujeirasDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
D Gomez-ArbelaezDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
M A ZuletCIBER de Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
M C CarreiraDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
I SajouxMedical Department Pronokal, Protein Supplies SL, Barcelona, Spain.
D de LuisDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, School of Medicine, Center of Investigation of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clinico Universitario Valladolid, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
A I CastroDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
J BaltarDivision of General Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
I BaamondeDivision of General Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
A SueiroDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
M Macias-GonzalezCIBER de Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
D BellidoDivision of Endocrinology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol and Coruña University, Ferrol, Spain.
F J TinahonesCIBER de Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J A MartinezCIBER de Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
F F CasanuevaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS) and Santiago de Compostela University (USC), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESServicio Gallego de Salud · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) has been suggested to be an endocrine signal of nutritional status and an active regulator of metabolism. However, there is no agreement on the effect of weight-loss therapies on circulating levels of FGF21 in humans.

objectiveTo assess FGF21 circulating levels in adiposity excess and after different weight-loss strategies prescribed in five different groups from four independent centers. SUBJECTS AND

methodsBody composition, ketosis, insulin sensitivity and FGF21 were evaluated in 181 excess body weight and 14 normal-weight subjects. From the excess body weight patients, two independent groups (discovery cohort; n=20 and validation cohort; n=28) undertook a very low-calorie ketogenic (VLCK) diet, a third group followed a low-calorie (LC) diet (n=84) and other two groups underwent bariatric surgery (discovery cohort; n=24 and validation cohort; n=25). The follow-up was 4 to 6 or 12 months, respectively.

resultsFGF21 levels were higher in excess body weight patients than in normal-weight subjects. The energy-restriction therapy to lose weight induced a significant decrease, with respect to baseline, in circulating levels of FGF21 (VLCK: -62.5 pg ml

conclusionsFGF21 levels were reduced after energy-restricted treatments and severely increased after bariatric surgery, independently of the weight reduction magnitude, insulin sensitivity or ketosis. Therefore, FGF21 appears to be a marker of severe nutritional stress.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryCaloric RestrictionStress, PhysiologicalAdultBiomarkersBody CompositionFemaleFibroblast Growth FactorsFollow-Up StudiesHumansInsulin ResistanceKetosisMaleNutritional StatusObesity, MorbidSpainBiomarkersfibroblast growth factor 21Fibroblast Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID28588304
OpenAlexW2624050046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.