Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600913›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017

Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial.

Laura A Young, John B Buse, Mark A Weaver, Maihan B Vu, C Madeline Mitchell, Tamara Blakeney, Kimberlea Grimm, Jennifer Rees, Franklin Niblock, Katrina E Donahue and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02033499 (Effect of Glucose Monitoring on Patient and Provider Outcomes in Non-insulin Treated Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02033499 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Glucose Monitoring on Patient and Provider Outcomes in Non-insulin Treated Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2014 to 2016Enrolled450ConditionsDIABETES MELLITUS, NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT, 2 (Disorder)ArmsSMBG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura A YoungDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
John B BuseDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Mark A WeaverDepartments of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Maihan B VuCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, UNC Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
C Madeline MitchellCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Tamara BlakeneyCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Kimberlea GrimmCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Jennifer ReesCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Franklin NiblockSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Katrina E DonahueCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Monitor Trial Group
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) levels in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes has been debated. Objective: To compare 3 approaches of SMBG for effects on hemoglobin A1c levels and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among people with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in primary care practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Monitor Trial study was a pragmatic, open-label randomized trial conducted in 15 primary care practices in central North Carolina. Participants were randomized between January 2014 and July 2015. Eligible patients with type 2 non-insulin-treated diabetes were: older than 30 years, established with a primary care physician at a participating practice, had glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c) levels higher than 6.5% but lower than 9.5% within the 6 months preceding screening, as obtained from the electronic medical record, and willing to comply with the results of random assignment into a study group. Of the 1032 assessed for eligibility, 450 were randomized. Interventions: No SMBG, once-daily SMBG, and once-daily SMBG with enhanced patient feedback including automatic tailored messages delivered via the meter. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes included hemoglobin A1c levels and HRQOL at 52 weeks. Results: A total of 450 patients were randomized and 418 (92.9%) completed the final visit. There were no significant differences in hemoglobin A1c levels across all 3 groups (P = .74; estimated adjusted mean hemoglobin A1c difference, SMBG with messaging vs no SMBG, -0.09%; 95% CI, -0.31% to 0.14%; SMBG vs no SMBG, -0.05%; 95% CI, -0.27% to 0.17%). There were also no significant differences found in HRQOL. There were no notable differences in key adverse events including hypoglycemia frequency, health care utilization, or insulin initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, we observed no clinically or statistically significant differences at 1 year in glycemic control or HRQOL between patients who performed SMBG compared with those who did not perform SMBG. The addition of this type of tailored feedback provided through messaging via a meter did not provide any advantage in glycemic control. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033499.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Quality of LifeAdultAgedBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDisease ManagementFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28600913
PMCPMC5818811
OpenAlexW2623217224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.