Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619041›Full record

Observational studyBMC research notes2017

Assessment of short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ).

Ditte Hjorth Laursen, Karl Bang Christensen, Ulla Christensen, Anne Frølich

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Saudi family physician's clinical inertia of type 2 diabetes management.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ditte Hjorth LaursenResearch Unit of Chronic Conditions, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 20D, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark. Dittehjorth@gmail.com.
Karl Bang ChristensenDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Postboks 2099, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Ulla ChristensenDepartment of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Postboks 2099, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Anne FrølichResearch Unit of Chronic Conditions, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 20D, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes is a progressive chronic illness that will affect more than 500 million people worldwide by 2030. It is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Finding the right care management for diabetes patients is necessary to effectively address the growing population of affected individuals and escalating costs. Patient education is one option for improving patient self-management. However, there are large discrepancies in the outcomes of such programs and long-term data are lacking. We assessed the short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ).

methodsWe conducted a observational cohort study of 83 type 2 diabetes patients participating in patient education programs in Denmark. The seven-scale HeiQ was completed by telephone interview at baseline and 2 weeks (76 participants, 93%) and 12 months (66, 80%) after the patient education ended. Changes over time were assessed using mean values and standard deviation at each time point and Cohen effect sizes.

resultsPatients reported improvements 2 weeks after the program ended in 4 of 7 constructs: skills and technique acquisition (ES = 0.59), self-monitoring and insight (ES = 0.52), constructive attitudes and approaches (ES = 0.43) and social integration and support (ES = 0.27). After 12 months, patients reported improvements in 3 of 7 constructs: skills and technique acquisition (ES = 0.66), constructive attitudes and approaches (ES = 0.43), and emotional wellbeing (ES = 0.44). Skills and technique showed the largest short- and long-term effect size. No significant changes were found in health-related activity or positive and active engagement in life over time.

conclusionAfter 12 months, diabetes patients who participated in patient education demonstrated increased self-management skills, improved acceptance of their chronic illness and decreased negative emotional response to their disease. Applying HeiQ as an outcome measure yielded new knowledge as to what patients with diabetes can obtain by participating in a patient education.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAgedChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDenmarkDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesDenmarkHealth education impact questionnairePatient educationSelf-managementType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28619041
PMCPMC5471707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.