Trial reportEye (London, England)2017
A novel graft option after pterygium excision: platelet-rich fibrin for conjunctivoplasty.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus amniotic membrane graft transplantation after pterygium excision: a randomised clinical trial.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Effects of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Article
- Use of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane During Pterygium Excision: Health Economic Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane for Pterygium Surgery: Literature Review and Feasibility Assessment.Cureus · 2021Review
- Conjunctival Autograft With Fibrin Glue for Pterygium: A Long Term Recurrence Assessment.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2019Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Neurotrophic Corneal Ulcer.Journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo compare the surgical results, complications, and recurrence rates of primary pterygium excision with conjunctival autografts (CA) vs platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) grafts.Patients and methodsA total of 35 eyes of 35 patients with primary pterygium were included in the study. The patients underwent excision of pterygium followed by closure of the bare sclera by CA (group 1, n=20) vs PRF grafts (group 2, n=15). The PRF was generated from the patients' own whole-blood sample by centrifugation and pressing. The surgery times, intra/postoperative complications, recurrence rates of pterygium, and changes in visual acuity (VA) were evaluated and compared within groups.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 14.3±6.5 months (6-24 months). The mean preoperative and postoperative VAs were same (20/25) (P=0.204). The mean surgery time was shorter in group 2 (22.1±1.9 min) compared to group 1 (33.8±7.8 min) (P=0.001). The recurrence was observed only in one (6.6%) case of group 2, while none of the cases showed recurrence in group 1. Graft loss was observed in 2 (10%) cases in group 1, and 1 (6.6%) case in group 2. No other intra/postoperative complications such as tear in the graft, excessive bleeding, scleral necrosis, graft necrosis, pannus formation, or symblepharon occurred in both groups.ConclusionsThis preliminary study showed encouraging results of the application of PRF for conjuntivoplasty after pterygium excision. The use of PRF in pterygium surgery is a simple, easily applicable, and a promising method with low rates of recurrence and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.