Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627913›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2017

Effect of attentional retraining on cognition, craving, and smoking in African American smokers.

Cendrine D Robinson, Christine Muench, Emily Brede, Romano Endrighi, Edwin H Szeto, Joanna R Sells, John P Lammers, Kolawole S Okuyemi, Andrew J Waters

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cendrine D RobinsonDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Christine MuenchDepartment of Psychology, American University.
Emily BredeDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Romano EndrighiDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Edwin H SzetoDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Joanna R SellsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
John P LammersDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Kolawole S OkuyemiDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota.
Andrew J WatersDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USUniversity of Minnesota System · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Smartphone intervention to reduce the influence of smoking cues for Black smokersF31CA180625 · NCI · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI ROBINSON, CENDRINE · 2013 to 2013
$18k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA180625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African American cigarette smokers have lower rates of cessation than Whites and live in communities with a higher number of tobacco advertisements. Exposure to smoking cues may promote smoking and undermine cessation. It may be possible to reduce attention to smoking cues ("attentional bias"). In this study, we investigated the effect of attentional retraining (AR) on attentional bias and smoking in African American smokers. Nontreatment- seeking African American smokers (N = 64) were randomly assigned to an AR or control condition. Participants were given a mobile device for 2 weeks and prompted to complete up to 3 AR (or control) trainings per day. Participants completed assessments of attentional bias, craving, and smoking both in the lab and in the field. Participants in the AR and control conditions completed an average of 29.07 AR (SD = 12.48) and 30.61 control training tasks (SD = 13.07), respectively. AR reduced attentional bias assessed in the laboratory, F(1, 126) = 9.20, p = .003, and field, F(1, 374) = 6.18, p = .01. This effect generalized to new stimuli, but not to new tasks. AR did not significantly reduce craving or biological measures of smoking. Smoking assessed on the mobile device declined over days in the AR group, F(1, 26) = 10.95, p = .003, but not in the control group, F(1, 27) = 0.02, p = .89. Two weeks of AR administered on a mobile device reduced attentional bias in African American smokers and had mixed effects on smoking. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

CravingAdultAttentional BiasBehavior TherapyBlack or African AmericanCognitionCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28627913
PMCPMC5546953
OpenAlexW2721466118

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.