Evidence mapPaperPMID 28640507Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2017

A liver-specific gene expression panel predicts the differentiation status of in vitro hepatocyte models.

Dae-Soo Kim, Jea-Woon Ryu, Mi-Young Son, Jung-Hwa Oh, Kyung-Sook Chung, Sugi Lee, Jeong-Ju Lee, Jun-Ho Ahn, Ju-Sik Min, Jiwon Ahn and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Monitoring Cultured Rat Hepatocytes Using RNA-Seq In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dae-Soo KimGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jea-Woon RyuGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Young SonDepartment of Functional Genomics, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwa OhKorea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Sook ChungGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sugi LeeGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Ju LeeGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Ho AhnGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Sik MinGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jiwon AhnGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Mi KangStem Cell Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Janghwan KimDepartment of Functional Genomics, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-958X
Cho-Rok JungDepartment of Functional Genomics, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Soon KimGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Soo ChoGenome Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative cell sources, such as three-dimensional organoids and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cells, might provide a potentially effective approach for both drug development applications and clinical transplantation. For example, the development of cell sources for liver cell-based therapy has been increasingly needed, and liver transplantation is performed for the treatment for patients with severe end-stage liver disease. Differentiated liver cells and three-dimensional organoids are expected to provide new cell sources for tissue models and revolutionary clinical therapies. However, conventional experimental methods confirming the expression levels of liver-specific lineage markers cannot provide complete information regarding the differentiation status or degree of similarity between liver and differentiated cell sources. Therefore, in this study, to overcome several issues associated with the assessment of differentiated liver cells and organoids, we developed a liver-specific gene expression panel (LiGEP) algorithm that presents the degree of liver similarity as a "percentage." We demonstrated that the percentage calculated using the LiGEP algorithm was correlated with the developmental stages of in vivo liver tissues in mice, suggesting that LiGEP can correctly predict developmental stages. Moreover, three-dimensional cultured HepaRG cells and human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells showed liver similarity scores of 59.14% and 32%, respectively, although general liver-specific markers were detected.

conclusionOur study describes a quantitative and predictive model for differentiated samples, particularly liver-specific cells or organoids; and this model can be further expanded to various tissue-specific organoids; our LiGEP can provide useful information and insights regarding the differentiation status of in vitro liver models. (Hepatology 2017;66:1662-1674).

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAlgorithmsCell Culture TechniquesHepatocytesHep G2 CellsHumansSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID28640507
PMCPMC5698781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.