ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2017
Cross calibration of
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic value ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Multicenter development and validation of a probability-based model to diagnose Lewy body disease using ¹²³I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Machine learning for automated differentiation of parkinson's disease and its mimics using ¹²³I-mIBG scintigraphy: insights from a multicentre real-world cohort (ITA-mIBG study).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Establishment of aAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Myocardium-to-cavity ratio derived from simultaneousEJNMMI reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of conversion coefficients for I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine heart-to-mediastinum ratio.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Taiwanese and European Calibration Factors for Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio in MulticenterAnnals of nuclear cardiology · 2023Article
- Phantom-Based Standardization Method forAnnals of nuclear cardiology · 2023Article
- TheJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The utility of heart-to-mediastinum ratio using a planar image created from IQ-SPECT with Iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Calibrated scintigraphic imaging procedures improve quantitative assessment of the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Phase dyssynchrony andJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- High-speed scanning of planar images showingEJNMMI research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac
methodsCross-calibration phantom studies using an Anger camera with a low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimator and D-SPECT, and clinical
resultsBased on the phantom experiments, the CC of the Anger camera with an LEHR collimator and of D-SPECT using an anterior planogram was 0.55 and 0.63, respectively. The original HMR from the Anger camera and D-SPECT was 1.76 ± 0.42 and 1.86 ± 0.55, respectively (p < 0.0001). After D-SPECT HMR was converted to the Anger camera condition, the corrected D-SPECT HMR became comparable to the values under the Anger camera condition (1.75 ± 0.48, p = n. s.). When the HMR measured using the two cameras were converted under the ME88 condition, the average standardized HMR from the Anger camera and D-SPECT became comparable (2.21 ± 0.65 vs. 2.20 ± 0.75, p = n. s.). After standardization to the ME88 condition, a systematic difference in the linear regression lines disappeared, and the HMR from both the Anger (StdHMR
conclusionThe phantom-based conversion method is applicable to D-SPECT and enables the common application of HMR irrespective of D-SPECT and the Anger camera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.