Evidence mapPaperPMID 28697252Full record

SynthesisJAMA2017

Association of Positive Airway Pressure With Cardiovascular Events and Death in Adults With Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jie Yu, Zien Zhou, R Doug McEvoy, Craig S Anderson, Anthony Rodgers, Vlado Perkovic, Bruce Neal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
26.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 357 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jie YuDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Ministry of Health, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China2The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Zien ZhouThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia3Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
R Doug McEvoyAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Craig S AndersonThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia5The George Institute China, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China6Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Health Partners, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony RodgersThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vlado PerkovicThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia7The Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia8Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
UNSW Sydney · AUAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health · AUGeorge Institute for Global Health · GBShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSleep apnea (obstructive and central) is associated with adverse cardiovascular risk factors and increased risks of cardiovascular disease. Positive airway pressure (PAP) provides symptomatic relief, whether delivered continuously (CPAP) or as adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV), but the associations with cardiovascular outcomes and death are unclear.

objectiveTo assess the association of PAP vs control with cardiovascular events and death in patients with sleep apnea. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception date to March 2017 for randomized clinical trials that included reporting of major adverse cardiovascular events or deaths. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently extracted data using standardized forms. Summary relative risks (RRs), risk differences (RDs) and 95% CIs were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were a composite of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events, stroke, or vascular death (major adverse cardiovascular events); cause-specific vascular events; and death.

resultsThe analyses included data from 10 trials (9 CPAP; 1 ASV) of patients with sleep apnea (N = 7266; mean age, 60.9 [range, 51.5 to 71.1] years; 5847 [80.5%] men; mean [SD] body mass index, 30.0 [5.2]. Among 356 major adverse cardiovascular events and 613 deaths recorded, there was no significant association of PAP with major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.13]; P = .19 and RD, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.01]; P = .23), cardiovascular death (RR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.50]; P = .30 and RD -0.00 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02]; P = .87), or all-cause death (RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.29]; P = .08 and RD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.01]; P = .51). The same was true for ACS, stroke, and heart failure. There was no evidence of different associations for CPAP vs ASV (all P value homogeneity >.24), and meta-regressions identified no associations of PAP with outcomes for different levels of apnea severity, follow-up duration, or adherence to PAP (all P values > .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of PAP, compared with no treatment or sham, was not associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular outcomes or death for patients with sleep apnea. Although there are other benefits of treatment with PAP for sleep apnea, these findings do not support treatment with PAP with a goal of prevention of these outcomes.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultCardiovascular DiseasesContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansSleep Apnea Syndromes

Identifiers

PMID28697252
PMCPMC5541330
OpenAlexW2734849770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.