ArticlePloS one2017
Nanosecond electric pulses differentially affect inward and outward currents in patch clamped adrenal chromaffin cells.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- NaThe Journal of membrane biology · 2026Article
- Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025Review
- Genetically engineered HEK cells as a valuable tool for studying electroporation in excitable cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dynamics of cell membrane lesions and adaptive conductance under the electrical stress.Cell stress · 2024Article
- Identification of Proteins Involved in Cell Membrane Permeabilization by Nanosecond Electric Pulses (nsEP).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Series resistance errors in whole cell voltage clamp measured directly with dual patch-clamp recordings: not as bad as you think.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF): Opening the Biotechnological Pandora's Box.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- 5 ns electric pulses induce CaBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Modifications of Plasma Membrane Organization in Cancer Cells for Targeted Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Review
- Pulsed Electric Fields Can Create Pores in the Voltage Sensors of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Probing Nanoelectroporation and Resealing of the Cell Membrane by the Entry of CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effect of 5 ns electric pulses on macroscopic ionic currents in whole-cell voltage-clamped adrenal chromaffin cells. Current-voltage (I-V) relationships first established that the early peak inward current was primarily composed of a fast voltage-dependent Na+ current (INa), whereas the late outward current was composed of at least three ionic currents: a voltage-gated Ca2+ current (ICa), a Ca2+-activated K+ current (IK(Ca)), and a sustained voltage-dependent delayed rectifier K+ current (IKV). A constant-voltage step protocol was next used to monitor peak inward and late outward currents before and after cell exposure to a 5 ns pulse. A single pulse applied at an electric (E)-field amplitude of 5 MV/m resulted in an instantaneous decrease of ~4% in peak INa that then declined exponentially to a level that was ~85% of the initial level after 10 min. Increasing the E-field amplitude to 8 or 10 MV/m caused a twofold greater inhibitory effect on peak INa. The decrease in INa was not due to a change in either the steady-state inactivation or activation of the Na+ channel but instead was associated with a decrease in maximal Na+ conductance. Late outward current was not affected by a pulse applied at 5 MV/m. However, for a pulse applied at the higher E-field amplitudes of 8 and 10 MV/m, late outward current in some cells underwent a progressive ~22% decline over the course of the first 20 s following pulse exposure, with no further decline. The effect was most likely concentrated on ICa and IK(Ca) as IKV was not affected. The results of this study indicate that in whole-cell patch clamped adrenal chromaffin cells, a 5 ns pulse differentially inhibits specific voltage-gated ionic currents in a manner that can be manipulated by tuning E-field amplitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.