Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700658›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Nanosecond electric pulses differentially affect inward and outward currents in patch clamped adrenal chromaffin cells.

Lisha Yang, Gale L Craviso, P Thomas Vernier, Indira Chatterjee, Normand Leblanc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NaThe Journal of membrane biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. 5 ns electric pulses induce CaBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisha YangDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Gale L CravisoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.
P Thomas VernierFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States of America.
Indira ChatterjeeDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Normand LeblancDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-9432
University of Nevada, Reno · USOld Dominion University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effect of 5 ns electric pulses on macroscopic ionic currents in whole-cell voltage-clamped adrenal chromaffin cells. Current-voltage (I-V) relationships first established that the early peak inward current was primarily composed of a fast voltage-dependent Na+ current (INa), whereas the late outward current was composed of at least three ionic currents: a voltage-gated Ca2+ current (ICa), a Ca2+-activated K+ current (IK(Ca)), and a sustained voltage-dependent delayed rectifier K+ current (IKV). A constant-voltage step protocol was next used to monitor peak inward and late outward currents before and after cell exposure to a 5 ns pulse. A single pulse applied at an electric (E)-field amplitude of 5 MV/m resulted in an instantaneous decrease of ~4% in peak INa that then declined exponentially to a level that was ~85% of the initial level after 10 min. Increasing the E-field amplitude to 8 or 10 MV/m caused a twofold greater inhibitory effect on peak INa. The decrease in INa was not due to a change in either the steady-state inactivation or activation of the Na+ channel but instead was associated with a decrease in maximal Na+ conductance. Late outward current was not affected by a pulse applied at 5 MV/m. However, for a pulse applied at the higher E-field amplitudes of 8 and 10 MV/m, late outward current in some cells underwent a progressive ~22% decline over the course of the first 20 s following pulse exposure, with no further decline. The effect was most likely concentrated on ICa and IK(Ca) as IKV was not affected. The results of this study indicate that in whole-cell patch clamped adrenal chromaffin cells, a 5 ns pulse differentially inhibits specific voltage-gated ionic currents in a manner that can be manipulated by tuning E-field amplitude.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationAdrenal GlandsAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedChromaffin CellsElectrophysiologyMembrane Potentials

Identifiers

PMID28700658
PMCPMC5507283
OpenAlexW2735275605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.