Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28723916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Stakeholders' views and experiences of care and interventions for addressing frailty and pre-frailty: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Barbara D'Avanzo, Rachel Shaw, Silvia Riva, Joao Apostolo, Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos, Donata Kurpas, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Carol Holland

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools.JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frailty in Older Adults.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Identifying and Managing Frailty: A Survey of UK Healthcare Professionals.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Barbara D'AvanzoUnit for Quality of Care and Rights Promotion in Mental Health, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmcologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-7263
Rachel ShawAston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Silvia RivaUnit for Quality of Care and Rights Promotion in Mental Health, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmcologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Joao ApostoloHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, The Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: a Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Elzbieta Bobrowicz-CamposHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, The Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: a Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Donata KurpasDepartment of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Maria Bujnowska-FedakHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, The Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: a Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Carol HollandAston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra · PTAston University · GBMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Milan · ITWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is a common condition in older age and is a public health concern which requires integrated care and involves different stakeholders. This meta-synthesis focuses on experiences, understanding, and attitudes towards screening, care, intervention and prevention for frailty across frail and healthy older persons, caregivers, health and social care practitioners. Studies published since 2001 were identified through search of electronic databases; 81 eligible papers were identified and read in full, and 45 papers were finally included and synthesized. The synthesis was conducted with a meta-ethnographic approach. We identified four key themes: Uncertainty about malleability of frailty; Strategies to prevent or to respond to frailty; Capacity to care and person and family-centred service provision; Power and choice. A bottom-up approach which emphasises and works in synchrony with frail older people's and their families' values, goals, resources and optimisation strategies is necessary. A greater employment of psychological skills, enhancing communication abilities and tools to overcome disempowering attitudes should inform care organisation, resulting in more efficient and satisfactory use of services. Public health communication about prevention and management of frailty should be founded on a paradigm of resilience, balanced acceptance, and coping. Addressing stakeholders' views about the preventability of frailty was seen as a salient need.

Indexed as

CaregiversFrail ElderlyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID28723916
PMCPMC5516973
OpenAlexW2736438067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.