Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2017
Two-year follow-up of 4 months metformin treatment vs. placebo in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: data from the GIPS-III RCT.
Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01217307. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Metabolic Modulation With Metformin to Reduce Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Glycometabolic Intervention as Adjunct to Primary Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (GIPS-III): a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Metformin with the Mortality and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Pre-existing Cardiovascular Diseases.Drugs · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Effect of metformin on adverse outcomes in T2DM patients: Systemic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Metformin and heart failure-related outcomes in patients with or without diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Heart failure reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of metformin on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and an updated meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019Pooled it
- Sex differences in cardiac structure and function following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Melatonin and mitochondrial protection in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms, evidence and translational perspectives.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
- Metformin Beyond Glycemic Control: Cardiovascular Protection and Diabetes Prevention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Repurposing metformin for cardioprotection: mechanisms and therapeutic potential across cardiovascular pathologies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Molecular Insights, Forensic Perspectives, and Therapeutic Horizons.Cells · 2025Review
- FOXM1 Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rodent and Porcine Models by Suppressing MKRN1-Dependent LKB1 Ubiquitination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Metformin's Overall Effectiveness and Combined Action with Lifestyle Interventions in Preventing Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus in High-Risk Metformin-Naïve Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published RCTs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Unraveling genetic causality between metformin and myocardial infarction on the basis of Mendelian randomization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Effects of Metformin on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: New Evidence and Mechanisms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Immunometabolism at the Heart of Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2023Review
- Protective effects of metformin in various cardiovascular diseases: Clinical evidence and AMPK-dependent mechanisms.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Perspectives on mitochondrial relevance in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Effects of Metformin in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiological Rationale to Clinical Evidence.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Mitochondria as a therapeutic target for cardiac ischemia‑reperfusion injury (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2021Review
- Metformin: A Novel Weapon Against Inflammation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Metformin Preconditioning Improves Hepatobiliary Function and Reduces Injury in a Rat Model of Normothermic Machine Perfusion and Orthotopic Transplantation.Transplantation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPreclinical and clinical studies suggested cardioprotective effects of metformin treatment. In the GIPS-III trial, 4 months of metformin treatment did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Here, we report the 2-year follow-up results.
methodsBetween January 2011 and May 2013, 379 STEMI patients without diabetes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to a 4-month treatment with metformin (500 mg twice daily) (N = 191) or placebo (N = 188) in the University Medical Center Groningen. Two-year follow-up data was collected to determine its effect on predefined secondary endpoints: the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), its individual components, all-cause mortality, and new-onset diabetes.
resultsFor all 379 patients all-cause mortality data were available. For seven patients (2%) follow-up data on MACE was limited, ranging from 129 to 577 days. All others completed the 2-year follow-up visit. Incidence of MACE was 11 (5.8%) in metformin and 6 (3.2%) in placebo treated patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, confidence interval (CI) 0.68-4.97, P = 0.22]. Three patients died in the metformin group and one in the placebo treatment group. Individual components of MACE were also comparable between both groups. New-onset diabetes mellitus was 34 (17.8%) in metformin and 32 (17.0%) in placebo treated patients (odds ratio 1.15, CI 0.66-1.98, P = 0.84). After multivariable adjustment the incidence of MACE was comparable between the treatment groups (HR 1.02, CI 0.10-10.78, P = 0.99).
conclusionsFour months metformin treatment initiated at the time of hospitalization in STEMI patients without diabetes did not exert beneficial long-term effects.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01217307.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.