Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790411›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection.

Xiaohong Wang, Yiqiang Liu, Zhaojian Niu, Runjia Fu, Yongning Jia, Li Zhang, Duanfang Shao, Hong Du, Ying Hu, Xiaofang Xing and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Prognostic Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer Patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-Scale Analysis Identified NID2, SPARC, and MFAP2 as Prognosis Markers of Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiaohong WangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Central Biobank Facility, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yiqiang LiuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhaojian NiuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong Province, China.
Runjia FuDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yongning JiaDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Duanfang ShaoDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Hong DuDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying HuKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Central Biobank Facility, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaofang XingDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaojing ChengDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ting GuoDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ziyu LiDepartment of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Qunsheng JiAsia & Emerging Markets Innovative Medicine, AstraZeneca R&D, Shanghai, China.
Lianhai ZhangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Central Biobank Facility, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China. zlhzlh@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-0233
Jiafu JiKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Central Biobank Facility, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China. jijiafu@hsc.pku.edu.cn.

Funding

Impact of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Receptor Targeting and FunctioningR03AA020101 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CALDWELL, KEVIN K. · 2010 to 2011
$148k
NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a practical, reliable assay for prognosis and chemotherapy benefit prediction compared with conventional staging in Gastric cancer (GC). Twenty-three candidate genes with significant correlation between quantitative hybridization and microarray results plus 2 reference genes were selected to form a 25-gene prognostic classifier, which can classify patients into 3 distinct groups of different risk of mortality obtained by analyzing microarray data from 78 frozen tumor specimens. The 25-gene assay was associated with overall survival in both training (P = 0.017) and testing cohort (P = 0.005) (462 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples). The risk prediction in stages I + II is significantly better than that in stages III. Analysis demonstrated that this 25-gene signature is an independent prognostic predictor and show higher prognostic accuracy than conventional TNM staging in early stage patients. Moreover, only high-risk patients in stage I + II were found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.043), while low-risk patients in stage III were not found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, our results suggest that this 25-gene assay can reliably identify patients with different risk for mortality after surgery, especially for stage I + II patients, and might be able to predict patients who benefit from chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTranscriptomeAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRiskStomach NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28790411
PMCPMC5548732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.