ArticleHeliyon2017
Global survey of mRNA levels and decay rates of
Article in Heliyon, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution and viability of ocular and non-ocular Chlamydia trachomatis in households in a trachoma-endemic community in Oromia, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis intra-bacterial and total plasmid copy number in clinical urogenital samples.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of RNA Decay in the CyanobacteriummSystems · 2020Article
- Context-Dependent Action of Scc4 Reinforces Control of the Type III Secretion System.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Regulation of mRNA Stability During Bacterial Stress Responses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Transcriptional Expression of theMicroorganisms · 2019Article
- Characterization of Chlamydial Rho and the Role of Rho-Mediated Transcriptional Polarity during Interferon Gamma-Mediated Tryptophan Limitation.Infection and immunity · 2018Article
- Regulatory Tools for Controlling Gene Expression in Cyanobacteria.Advances in experimental medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpreting the intricate bacterial transcriptomics implies understanding the dynamic relationship established between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.