Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28797245›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Fungal biomarker discovery by integration of classifiers.

João Pedro Saraiva, Marcus Oswald, Antje Biering, Daniela Röll, Cora Assmann, Tilman Klassert, Markus Blaess, Kristin Czakai, Ralf Claus, Jürgen Löffler and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

João Pedro SaraivaNetwork Modelling, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Beutenbergstraße 11a, Jena, Germany.
Marcus OswaldNetwork Modelling, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Beutenbergstraße 11a, Jena, Germany.
Antje BieringNetwork Modelling, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Beutenbergstraße 11a, Jena, Germany.
Daniela RöllNetwork Modelling, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Beutenbergstraße 11a, Jena, Germany.
Cora AssmannSeptomics Research Centre, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Tilman KlassertSeptomics Research Centre, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Markus BlaessCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Kristin CzakaiUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ralf ClausCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jürgen LöfflerUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Hortense SlevogtSeptomics Research Centre, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Rainer KönigNetwork Modelling, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Beutenbergstraße 11a, Jena, Germany. rainer.koenig@uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DELeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human immune system is responsible for protecting the host from infection. However, in immunocompromised individuals the risk of infection increases substantially with possible drastic consequences. In extreme, systemic infection can lead to sepsis which is responsible for innumerous deaths worldwide. Amongst its causes are infections by bacteria and fungi. To increase survival, it is mandatory to identify the type of infection rapidly. Discriminating between fungal and bacterial pathogens is key to determine if antifungals or antibiotics should be administered, respectively. For this, in situ experiments have been performed to determine regulation mechanisms of the human immune system to identify biomarkers. However, these studies led to heterogeneous results either due different laboratory settings, pathogen strains, cell types and tissues, as well as the time of sample extraction, to name a few.

methodsTo generate a gene signature capable of discriminating between fungal and bacterial infected samples, we employed Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) based classifiers on several datasets comprised of the above mentioned pathogens.

resultsWhen combining the classifiers by a joint optimization we could increase the consistency of the biomarker gene list independently of the experimental setup. An increase in pairwise overlap (the number of genes that overlap in each cross-validation) of 43% was obtained by this approach when compared to that of single classifiers. The refined gene list was composed of 19 genes and ranked according to consistency in expression (up- or down-regulated) and most of them were linked either directly or indirectly to the ERK-MAPK signalling pathway, which has been shown to play a key role in the immune response to infection. Testing of the identified 12 genes on an unseen dataset yielded an average accuracy of 83%.

conclusionsIn conclusion, our method allowed the combination of independent classifiers and increased consistency and reliability of the generated gene signatures.

Indexed as

Aspergillus fumigatusBacterial InfectionsComputational BiologyFungiGenetic MarkersHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMonocytesMycosesSupport Vector MachineGenetic MarkersFeature selectionFungal pathogensImmune responseMicroarraySystems biology

Identifiers

PMID28797245
PMCPMC5553868
OpenAlexW2744451733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.