Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2017

Combined effect of metformin with ascorbic acid versus acetyl salicylic acid on diabetes-related cardiovascular complication; a 12-month single blind multicenter randomized control trial.

Syed Wasif Gillani, Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman, Mohi Iqbal Mohammad Abdul, Mirza R Baig

Open access · goldFull text readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2017. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it favours the comparator in 1. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
241 · no effect
Glycemic controlfavours the comparator · against placebo · ascvd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
OR 2.311.87 to 4.42p < 0.001
FINDING: Patients with metformin and ascorbic acid (parallel arm I) was twice more likely to reduce HbA1c than metformin alone (control arm) in a year (OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.87-4.42) p < 0.001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×glycemic control

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 41 favour the treatment, 12 find no difference, 8 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.84replicated · 32 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.86This paper moves it by −0.02.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2017
OR 2.311.87 to 4.42
NCT02980276535 enrolled · 2017
OR 1.840.63 to 6.04
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Management of Diabetes Mellitus Using Medicinal Plants and Vitamins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Vitamin C and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Syed Wasif GillaniCollege of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Medina, Al-Madinah Munawarah, Saudi Arabia. syedw.gillani@gmail.com.
Syed Azhar Syed SulaimanSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), George Town, Malaysia.
Mohi Iqbal Mohammad AbdulCollege of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Medina, Al-Madinah Munawarah, Saudi Arabia.
Mirza R BaigDubai College of Pharmacy, Dubai, UAE.
Taibah University · SADubai Pharmacy College · AEUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundWe aimed to investigate the efficacy of ascorbic acid and acetylsalicylic acid among type II diabetes mellitus patients using metformin (only) for diabetes management therapy.

methodA 12-month single blinded multicenter randomized control trial was designed to investigate the measured variables [Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c), Renal function, Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) etc.]. The trial was randomized into 2 experimental parallel arms (ascorbic acid vs acetylsalicylic acid) were blinded with study supplements in combination with metformin and findings were compared to control arm with metformin alone and blinded with placebo. Withdrawal criteria was defined to maintain the equity and balance in the participants in the whole trial. FINDING: Patients with metformin and ascorbic acid (parallel arm I) was twice more likely to reduce HbA1c than metformin alone (control arm) in a year (OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.87-4.42) p < 0.001). Also Parallel arm I was ten times more likely to reduced risk factors contributing to long-term diabetes complications than participants of arm II in a year (OR 10.38 (95% CI 6.91-15.77) p < 0.001). In contrast, parallel arm II patients were seven times more effective to reduce the risk of expected CVD development in 10 years than arm I (OR 7.54 (95% CI 3.76-10.32) p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe trial concluded that ascorbic acid with metformin is more effective against reducing risks for diabetes related long-term complications (including ACR). TRIAL details Registration No: NTR-6100, Registry Name: Netherlands Trial Registry, URL: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6100 , Date of Registration: 20th October, 2016, Date of first Enrollment: 1 November, 2015.

Indexed as

AdultAscorbic AcidAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodAscorbic AcidAspirinHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminAnti-inflammatoryAntioxidantsDiabetes careMetforminRandomized control trials

Identifiers

PMID28807030
PMCPMC5556597
OpenAlexW2748197398

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.