ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018
In-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predicts neointimal hyperplasia after two years.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Atherogenic Index of Plasma Predicts Carotid in-Stent Restenosis: Development and Validation of a Nomogram.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Risk factors of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: long-term follow-up study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Symptomatic atherosclerotic plaque progression in a first-generation carotid stent: management and 5-year clinical and imaging outcome-a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- Risk Factors for Residual Stenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Postoperative ischemic events in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting using algorithmic selection for embolic protection.The neuroradiology journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction It has not been reported how long the follow-up study after carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be continued. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the dynamic change of the in-stent neointimal layer and residual arterial lumen by two years following CAS using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D CTA) with volume rendering. Methods Thirty-six stented carotid arteries in 34 consecutive patients were examined by 3D CTA with volume rendering at two weeks and 3, 6, 12, 24 months of follow-up. Results An in-stent hypodense area could be detected in 10 of 36 (27.8%) carotid arteries at two weeks after CAS. In-stent hypodense areas gradually declined thereafter by three months. In the course of longer follow-up, the layer of the in-stent hypodense area (neointimal hyperplasia) continued to grow in size for up to 24 months. Patients with an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks have a thicker layer of neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months than patients without in-stent hypodense area at two weeks' follow-up. The predictive factors for growing neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months in multiple regression analysis are ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and the thickness of in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following CAS. Conclusion Our results suggest that follow-up study should be continued for a longer period even if in-stent restenosis could not be detected at one year following CAS. Especially in cases with ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and with a subacute in-stent hypodense area after CAS, longer follow-up is strongly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.