Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817360›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2017

Closing the Gap: Mouse Models to Study Adhesion in Secondary Palatogenesis.

K J Lough, K M Byrd, D C Spitzer, S E Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of developmental genes in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palateJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hindbrain neuropore tissue geometry determines asymmetric cell-mediated closure dynamics in mouse embryos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K J Lough1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
K M Byrd1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
D C Spitzer1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
S E Williams1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
FaceBase 2 Coordinating CenterU01DE024449 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2014 to 2018
$10.2M
Idenfication of miRNAs involved midfacial development and cleftingU01DE020076 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ARTINGER, KRISTIN, CLOUTHIER, DAVID E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Mechanisms of Oral Epithelial DifferentiationK08DE026537 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BYRD, KEVIN MATTHEW · 2016 to 2020
$430k
Cell-cell adhesion in regulation of mammalian palatogenesisF31DE026956 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LOUGH, KENDALL · 2017 to 2018
$66k
NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE026956NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE026537NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE020076NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE024449NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary palatogenesis occurs when the bilateral palatal shelves (PS), arising from maxillary prominences, fuse at the midline, forming the hard and soft palate. This embryonic phenomenon involves a complex array of morphogenetic events that require coordinated proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and adhesion in the PS epithelia and underlying mesenchyme. When the delicate process of craniofacial morphogenesis is disrupted, the result is orofacial clefting, including cleft lip and cleft palate (CL/P). Through human genetic and animal studies, there are now hundreds of known genetic alternations associated with orofacial clefts; so, it is not surprising that CL/P is among the most common of all birth defects. In recent years, in vitro cell-based assays, ex vivo palate cultures, and genetically engineered animal models have advanced our understanding of the developmental and cell biological pathways that contribute to palate closure. This is particularly true for the areas of PS patterning and growth as well as medial epithelial seam dissolution during palatal fusion. Here, we focus on epithelial cell-cell adhesion, a critical but understudied process in secondary palatogenesis, and provide a review of the available tools and mouse models to better understand this phenomenon.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMorphogenesisAnimalsApoptosisCell AdhesionCell MovementCell ProliferationCleft LipCleft PalateGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMicePalateSignal Transductionafadincadherinscell adhesioncleft palateepitheliumnectins

Identifiers

PMID28817360
PMCPMC5613886

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.