Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835916›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

The evolutionary basis of premature migration in Pacific salmon highlights the utility of genomics for informing conservation.

Daniel J Prince, Sean M O'Rourke, Tasha Q Thompson, Omar A Ali, Hannah S Lyman, Ismail K Saglam, Thomas J Hotaling, Adrian P Spidle, Michael R Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing the Distribution ofEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel J PrinceDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0464-3981
Sean M O'RourkeDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Tasha Q ThompsonDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Omar A AliDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Hannah S LymanDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ismail K SaglamDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Thomas J HotalingSalmon River Restoration Council, 25631 Sawyers Bar Road, Sawyers Bar, CA 96027, USA.
Adrian P SpidleNorthwest Indian Fisheries Commission, 6730 Martin Way East, Olympia, WA 98516, USA.
Michael R MillerDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-8693

Funding

Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delineation of conservation units (CUs) is a challenging issue that has profound implications for minimizing the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. CU delineation typically seeks to prioritize evolutionary significance, and genetic methods play a pivotal role in the delineation process by quantifying overall differentiation between populations. Although CUs that primarily reflect overall genetic differentiation do protect adaptive differences between distant populations, they do not necessarily protect adaptive variation within highly connected populations. Advances in genomic methodology facilitate the characterization of adaptive genetic variation, but the potential utility of this information for CU delineation is unclear. We use genomic methods to investigate the evolutionary basis of premature migration in Pacific salmon, a complex behavioral and physiological phenotype that exists within highly connected populations and has experienced severe declines. Strikingly, we find that premature migration is associated with the same single locus across multiple populations in each of two different species. Patterns of variation at this locus suggest that the premature migration alleles arose from a single evolutionary event within each species and were subsequently spread to distant populations through straying and positive selection. Our results reveal that complex adaptive variation can depend on rare mutational events at a single locus, demonstrate that CUs reflecting overall genetic differentiation can fail to protect evolutionarily significant variation that has substantial ecological and societal benefits, and suggest that a supplemental framework for protecting specific adaptive variation will sometimes be necessary to prevent the loss of significant biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBiological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesGenomicsAllelesAnimalsBiodiversityGenetic VariationGeographyPhylogenyPopulation DynamicsQuantitative Trait LociSalmon

Identifiers

PMID28835916
PMCPMC5559211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.