Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835979›Full record

ReviewHerz2018

[Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR®) in patients with coronary artery disease].

S Baumann, A C Schaefer, A Hohneck, K Mueller, T Becher, M Behnes, M Renker, M Borggrefe, I Akin, D Lossnitzer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S BaumannI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland. stefanbaumann@gmx.at.
A C SchaeferI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
A HohneckI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
K MuellerI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
T BecherI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M BehnesI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M RenkerAbteilung für Kardiologie, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland.
M BorggrefeI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
I AkinI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
D LossnitzerI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary angiography is considered as the gold standard in the morphological representation of coronary artery stenosis. Coronary angiography is often performed without preprocedural non-invasive proof of ischemia and the assessment of the severity of a coronary lesion by morphology is very subjective. Thus, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement represents the current standard for estimation of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis and facilitates decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting. The FFR-guided revascularization strategy has been classified as a class IA recommendation in the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Both the DEFER and the FAME studies showed no treatment advantage of hemodynamically irrelevant stenosis. By use of FFR (and targeted interventions), clinical results could be improved as well as the procedure costs were reduced; however, the use in clinical practice is still limited due to the need of adenosine administration and a significant prolongation of the procedure. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR®) is a new innovative approach for the determination of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis which can be obtained at rest without the use of vasodilators. Regarding periprocedural complications as well as prognosis, iFR® showed non-inferiority compared to FFR in the SWEDEHEART and DEFINE-FLAIR trials.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary AngiographyHumansSeverity of Illness IndexCoronary angiographyCoronary stenosisFractional flow reserveIschemiaRevascularization

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.