Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28838068›Full record

ReviewILAR journal2017

Rat Genome and Model Resources.

Mary Shimoyama, Jennifer R Smith, Elizabeth Bryda, Takashi Kuramoto, Laura Saba, Melinda Dwinell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ILAR journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rat models of musculoskeletal lysosomal storage disorders and their role in pre-clinical evaluation of gene therapy approaches.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Establishing the hybrid rat diversity program: a resource for dissecting complex traits.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genome-to-phenome research in rats: progress and perspectives.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Bring Back the Rat!The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary ShimoyamaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jennifer R SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Elizabeth BrydaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Takashi KuramotoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Laura SabaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Melinda DwinellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rat Genome Database, Department of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

RAT GENOME DATABASER01HL064541 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ANNE E. KWITEK · 1999 to 2026
$50.0M
ResourceP40OD011062 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Elizabeth C Bryda · 2012 to 2026
$24.0M
The Heritable Transcriptome and AlcoholismR24AA013162 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HOFFMAN, PAULA, SABA, LAURA MAREN · 2001 to 2021
$14.2M
Gene targeted rat resource for the study of complex diseaseR24HL114474 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DWINELL, MELINDA R · 2013 to 2017
$8.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064541NHLBI NIH HHS R24 HL114474NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA013162NIH HHS P40 OD011062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rats remain a major model for studying disease mechanisms and discovery, validation, and testing of new compounds to improve human health. The rat's value continues to grow as indicated by the more than 1.4 million publications (second to human) at PubMed documenting important discoveries using this model. Advanced sequencing technologies, genome modification techniques, and the development of embryonic stem cell protocols ensure the rat remains an important mammalian model for disease studies. The 2004 release of the reference genome has been followed by the production of complete genomes for more than two dozen individual strains utilizing NextGen sequencing technologies; their analyses have identified over 80 million variants. This explosion in genomic data has been accompanied by the ability to selectively edit the rat genome, leading to hundreds of new strains through multiple technologies. A number of resources have been developed to provide investigators with access to precision rat models, comprehensive datasets, and sophisticated software tools necessary for their research. Those profiled here include the Rat Genome Database, PhenoGen, Gene Editing Rat Resource Center, Rat Resource and Research Center, and the National BioResource Project for the Rat in Japan.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsDatabase Management SystemsDatabases, GeneticGenomeHumansRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSoftwarebioinformaticsdatabasediseasegenomicsphenotyperatRattus norvegicusresource

Identifiers

PMID28838068
PMCPMC6057551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.