ArticleScientific reports2017
Microstructure-based constitutive model of coronary artery with active smooth muscle contraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Regional and Age-Dependent Microstructural Changes in Porcine Ventricles from Neonatal to Adulthood Using DT-MRI and TPEF-SHG Microscopy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Biomechanical characterization of the passive response of the thoracic aorta in chronic hypoxic newborn lambs using an evolutionary strategy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Endogenous hydrogen sulfide improves vascular remodeling through PPARδ/SOCS3 signaling.Journal of advanced research · 2021Review
- [Experimental measurement and modeling analysis of active and passive mechanical properties of arterial vessel wall].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020Article
- Assessing Collagen and Elastin Pressure-dependent Microarchitectures in Live, Human Resistance Arteries by Label-free Fluorescence Microscopy.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, there is no full three-dimensional (3D) microstructural mechanical model of coronary artery based on measured microstructure including elastin, collagen and smooth muscle cells. Many structural models employ mean values of vessel microstructure, rather than continuous distributions of microstructure, to predict the mechanical properties of blood vessels. Although some models show good agreements on macroscopic vessel responses, they result in a lower elastin stiffness and earlier collagen recruitment. Hence, a full microstructural constitutive model is required for better understanding vascular biomechanics in health and disease. Here, a 3D microstructural model that accounts for all constituent microstructure is proposed to predict macroscopic and microscopic responses of coronary arteries. Coronary artery microstructural parameters were determined based on previous statistical measurements while mechanical testing of arteries (n = 5) were performed in this study to validate the computational predictions. The proposed model not only provides predictions of active and passive stress distributions of vessel wall, but also enables reliable estimations of material parameters of individual fibers and cells and thus predicts microstructural stresses. The validated microstructural model of coronary artery sheds light on vascular biomechanics and can be extend to diseased vessels for better understanding of initiation, progression and clinical treatment of vascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.