ArticleScientific reports2017
Proteomic and network analysis of human serum albuminome by integrated use of quick crosslinking and two-step precipitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein "purity," proteoforms, and the albuminome: critical observations on proteome and systems complexity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- A strategy can be used to analyze intracellular interaction proteomics of cell-surface receptors.Amino acids · 2023Article
- An experimental workflow for enrichment of low abundant proteins from human serum for the discovery of serum biomarkers.Journal of biological methods · 2023Article
- Non-Invasive Identification of Sex in Cultured Bovine Embryos by UHPLC-MS/MS Metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Article
- Macromolecular crowding effects on the kinetics of opposing reactions catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021Article
- A next generation setup for pre-fractionation of non-denatured proteins reveals diverse albumin proteoforms each carrying several post-translational modifications.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affinity- and chemical-based methods are usually employed to prepare human serum albuminome; however, these methods remain technically challenging. Herein, we report the development of a two-step precipitation (TSP) method by combined use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and ethanol. PEG precipitation was newly applied to remove immunoglobulin G for albuminome preparation, which is simple, cost effective, efficient and compatible with downstream ethanol precipitation. Nonetheless, chemical extraction using TSP may disrupt weak and transient protein interactions with human serum albumin (HSA) leading to an incomplete albuminome. Accordingly, rapid fixation based on formaldehyde crosslinking (FC) was introduced into the TSP procedure. The developed FC-TSP method increased the number of identified proteins, probably by favouring real-time capture of weakly bound proteins in the albuminome. A total of 171 proteins excluding HSA were identified from the fraction obtained with FC-TSP. Further interaction network and cluster analyses revealed 125 HSA-interacting proteins and 14 highly-connected clusters. Compared with five previous studies, 55 new potential albuminome proteins including five direct and 50 indirect binders were only identified by our strategy and 12 were detected as common low-abundance proteins. Thus, this new strategy has the potential to effectively survey the human albuminome, especially low-abundance proteins of clinical interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.