Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Finding disagreement pathway signatures and constructing an ensemble model for cancer classification.

Qiaosheng Zhang, Jie Li, Dong Wang, Yadong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiaosheng ZhangHarbin Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China.
Jie LiHarbin Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China. jieli@hit.edu.cn.
Dong WangHarbin Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China.
Yadong WangHarbin Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China.
Harbin Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer classification based on molecular level is a relatively routine research procedure with advances in high-throughput molecular profiling techniques. However, the number of genes typically far exceeds the number of the sample size in gene expression studies. The existing gene selection methods are almost based on statistics and machine learning, overlooking relevant biological principles or knowledge while working with biological data. Here, we propose a robust ensemble learning paradigm, which incorporates multiple pathways information, to predict cancer classification. We compare the proposed method with other methods, such as Elastic SCAD and PPDMF, and estimate the classification performance. The results show that the proposed method has the higher performances on most metrics and robust performance. We further investigate the biological mechanism of the ensemble feature genes. The results demonstrate that the ensemble feature genes are associated with drug targets/clinically-relevant cancer. In addition, some core biological pathways and biological process underlying clinically-relevant phenotypes are identified by function annotation. Overall, our research can provide a new perspective for the further study of molecular activities and manifestations of cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksSupport Vector MachineAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsAtlases as TopicDatasets as TopicGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionTaxoidsAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm ProteinsTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID28855608
PMCPMC5577098
OpenAlexW2746893789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.