SynthesisWorld journal of urology2017
Efficacy of PDE5Is and SSRIs in men with premature ejaculation: a new systematic review and five meta-analyses.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors for premature ejaculation in adult men.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacotherapy of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2018Pooled it
- The application of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in selective dorsal neurotomy for primary premature ejaculation: a prospective single-center study.Asian journal of andrologyTrial
- Abnormal grey matter in identifying primary intravaginal anejaculation patients from healthy controls: a voxel-based morphometry analysis.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Prospective comparison of tadalafil 5 mg, dapoxetine 30 mg, and the combination of both in the treatment of premature ejaculation.Arab journal of urology · 2024Article
- Current and emerging treatment options for premature ejaculation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation in Adult Men: A Cochrane Systematic Review.The world journal of men's health · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy characteristics of oral drugs in patients with premature ejaculation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of impotence research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in men with premature ejaculation (PE).
methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and compared the results, including intravaginal ejaculation latency time, satisfaction, intercourse per-week and side effects after treatment with PDE5I or SSRIs versus placebo, combined use of PDE5I with SSRIs versus PDE5I or SSRIs alone, and PDE5I versus SSRIs for treating PE.
resultsThe study inclusion criteria were met by 23 studies (ten RCTs with five crossover studies) involving 6145 patients. The data synthesized from these studies indicated that the efficacy of PDE5Is and SSRIs was better than that of placebo (p < 0.00001; p < 0.00001); however, more patients had side effects while taking PDE5Is and SSRIs (p < 0.00001; p < 0.00001). The efficacy of the combined treatment was significantly better than that of PDE5Is or SSRIs alone (p < 0.00001; p < 0.00001); however, more patients had side effects from the combined treatment than from SSRIs (p = 0.0002), with no significant difference in PDE5Is (p = 0.5). The efficacy of PDE5Is was better than that of SSRIs (p = 0.006), and no significant difference was observed in the frequency of side effects (p = 0.93).
conclusionsPDE5Is were significantly more effective than placebo or SSRIs for treating PE, while SSRIs were better than placebo. The combined treatment had better efficacy than PDE5Is or SSRIs alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.