Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28914366›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Geriatric assessment with management intervention in older adults with cancer: a randomized pilot study.

Allison Magnuson, Tatyana Lemelman, Chintan Pandya, Molly Goodman, Marcus Noel, Mohammed Tejani, David Doughtery, William Dale, Arti Hurria, Michelle Janelsins and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Association of frailty with 90-day postoperative mortality & geriatric comanagement among older adults with cancer.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cognitive Function in Older Adults With Cancer: Assessment, Management, and Research Opportunities.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. Convergence of Geriatrics and Palliative Care to Deliver Personalized Supportive Care for Older Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Personalised treatment for older adults with cancer: The role of frailty assessment.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Allison MagnusonUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Tatyana LemelmanNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Chintan PandyaUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Molly GoodmanUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Marcus NoelUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mohammed TejaniUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
David DoughteryUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
William DaleUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Arti HurriaCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Michelle JanelsinsUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Feng Vankee LinUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Charles HecklerUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Supriya MohileUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Supriya_mohile@urmc.rochester.edu.
University of Rochester · USCity of Hope · USNew York Medical College · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Cancer Control Research Training Curriculum (R25T)R25CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JANELSINS, MICHELLE C, MORROW, GARY R · 2004 to 2018
$6.7M
Reducing Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older AdultsR01CA177592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2013 to 2018
$3.0M
Geriatric Assessment - Driven Interventions for Older Cancer PatientsR03AG042342 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2012 to 2013
$167k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177592NCI NIH HHS R25 CA102618NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS R03 AG042342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults receiving cancer therapy have heightened risk for treatment-related toxicity. Geriatric assessment (GA) can identify impairments, which may contribute to vulnerability and adverse outcomes. GA management interventions can address these impairments and have the potential to improve outcomes when implemented.

methodsWe conducted a randomized pilot study comparing GA with management interventions versus usual care in patients with stage III/IV solid tumor malignancies (N = 71). In all patients, a trained coordinator conducted and scored a baseline GA with pre-determined cutoffs for impairment. For patients randomized to the intervention arm, an algorithm was used to identify GA management recommendations based upon identified impairments. Recommendations were relayed to the primary oncologist for implementation. GA was repeated at 3 months. The primary outcome was grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, hospitalizations, dose reductions, dose delays, and early treatment discontinuation.

resultsThe mean participant age was 76 (70-89). The total number of GA management recommendations relayed was 409, of which 35.4% were implemented by the primary oncologist. Incidence of grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity did not differ between the two groups. Prevalence of hospitalization, dose reductions, dose delays, and early treatment discontinuation also did not differ between the two groups.

conclusionsAn algorithm can be used to guide GA management recommendations in older adults with cancer. However, reliance upon the primary oncologist for execution resulted in a low prevalence of implementation. Future work should aim to understand barriers to implementation and explore alternate models of implementing geriatric-focused care for older adults with cancer.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsCancerGeriatric assessment with managementGeriatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID28914366
PMCPMC5887127
OpenAlexW2755829345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.