ArticleHuman molecular genetics2017
The 16p11.2 homologs fam57ba and doc2a generate certain brain and body phenotypes.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Bridging the anatomical gap: evolutionary conservation of genetic mechanisms in corpus callosum disorders across human, mouse, and zebrafish.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
- A phenotypic brain organoid atlas and biobank for neurodevelopmental disorders.Cell stem cell · 2025Article
- doc2a and doc2b contribute to locomotor and social behaviors by down-regulating npas4b in zebrafish.BMC biology · 2025Article
- A Hypothesis: Metabolic Contributions to 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
- The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Strategies for dissecting the complexity of neurodevelopmental disorders.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024Review
- Understanding copy number variations through their genes: a molecular view on 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Dissecting the autism-associated 16p11.2 locus identifies multiple drivers in neuroanatomical phenotypes and unveils a male-specific role for the major vault protein.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of copy number variants in neuropsychiatric disorders: From genes to therapeutics.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2023Review
- Combinations of genes at the 16p11.2 and 22q11.2 CNVs contribute to neurobehavioral traits.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Tissue- and cell-type-specific molecular and functional signatures of 16p11.2 reciprocal genomic disorder across mouse brain and human neuronal models.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Seizures and Epilepsy in Individuals With Recurrent Deletions and Duplications in the 16p11.2 Region.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
- The gene dose makes the disease.Cell · 2022Article
- 16pdel lipid changes in iPSC-derived neurons and function of FAM57B in lipid metabolism and synaptogenesis.iScience · 2022Article
- Integration of genetic, transcriptomic, and clinical data provides insight into 16p11.2 and 22q11.2 CNV genes.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Dissecting the complexity of CNV pathogenicity: insights from Drosophila and zebrafish models.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021Review
- Functional assessment of the "two-hit" model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Prpf31 is essential for the survival and differentiation of retinal progenitor cells by modulating alternative splicing.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Zebrafish as a tool to study schizophrenia-associated copy number variants.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deletion of the 16p11.2 CNV affects 25 core genes and is associated with multiple symptoms affecting brain and body, including seizures, hyperactivity, macrocephaly, and obesity. Available data suggest that most symptoms are controlled by haploinsufficiency of two or more 16p11.2 genes. To identify interacting 16p11.2 genes, we used a pairwise partial loss of function antisense screen for embryonic brain morphology, using the accessible zebrafish model. fam57ba, encoding a ceramide synthase, was identified as interacting with the doc2a gene, encoding a calcium-sensitive exocytosis regulator, a genetic interaction not previously described. Using genetic mutants, we demonstrated that doc2a+/- fam57ba+/- double heterozygotes show hyperactivity and increased seizure susceptibility relative to wild-type or single doc2a-/- or fam57ba-/- mutants. Additionally, doc2a+/- fam57ba+/- double heterozygotes demonstrate the increased body length and head size. Single doc2a+/- and fam57ba+/- heterozygotes do not show a body size increase; however, fam57ba-/- homozygous mutants show a strongly increased head size and body length, suggesting a greater contribution from fam57ba to the haploinsufficient interaction between doc2a and fam57ba. The doc2a+/- fam57ba+/- interaction has not been reported before, nor has any 16p11.2 gene previously been linked to increased body size. These findings demonstrate that one pair of 16p11.2 homologs can regulate both brain and body phenotypes that are reflective of those in people with 16p11.2 deletion. Together, these findings suggest that dysregulation of ceramide pathways and calcium sensitive exocytosis underlies seizures and large body size associated with 16p11.2 homologs in zebrafish. The data inform consideration of mechanisms underlying human 16p11.2 deletion symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.