Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955656›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2017

Three-Dimensional Patient-Derived

Manuela Gaebler, Alessandra Silvestri, Johannes Haybaeck, Peter Reichardt, Caitlin D Lowery, Louis F Stancato, Gabriele Zybarth, Christian R A Regenbrecht

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06217224 (Evaluation of Prophylactic Photobiomodulation Therapy in Patients With Osteosarcoma Undergoing High Doses of Methotrexate), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06217224 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Prophylactic Photobiomodulation Therapy in Patients With Osteosarcoma Undergoing High Doses of Methotrexate

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancer, BrazilRan2022 to 2025Enrolled53ConditionsMucositis OralArmsPreventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring bone-tumor interactions through 3DJournal of bone oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Engineered bone marrow as a clinically relevant ex vivo model for primary bone cancer research and drug screening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuela GaeblerHELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
Alessandra Silvestricpo - Cellular Phenomics & Oncology Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes HaybaeckMedical Faculty, Department of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter ReichardtHELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
Caitlin D LoweryEli Lilly and Company, Oncology Translational Research, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Louis F StancatoEli Lilly and Company, Oncology Translational Research, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Gabriele Zybarthcpo - Cellular Phenomics & Oncology Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Christian R A Regenbrechtcpo - Cellular Phenomics & Oncology Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the development of new targeted therapeutics directed against specific molecular pathways involved in tumor cell proliferation and survival has allowed an essential improvement in carcinoma treatment. Unfortunately, the scenario is different for sarcomas, a group of malignant neoplasms originating from mesenchymal cells, for which the main therapeutic approach still consists in the combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The lack of innovative approaches in sarcoma treatment stems from the high degree of heterogeneity of this tumor type, with more that 70 different histopathological subtypes, and the limited knowledge of the molecular drivers of tumor development and progression. Currently, molecular therapies are available mainly for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, a soft-tissue malignancy characterized by an activating mutation of the tyrosine kinase KIT. Since the first application of this approach, a strong effort has been made to understand sarcoma molecular alterations that can be potential targets for therapy. The low incidence combined with the high level of histopathological heterogeneity makes the development of clinical trials for sarcomas very challenging. For this reason, preclinical studies are needed to better understand tumor biology with the aim to develop new targeted therapeutics. Currently, these studies are mainly based on

Indexed as

drug screeningin vitro organoid culturepatient-derived in vitro modelpersonalized medicinepreclinical modelsarcomasarcoma treatment

Identifiers

PMID28955656
PMCPMC5601986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.