Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959548›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2016

Use of

Carla Caroline Cunha Bastos, Paulo Henrique Marcelino de Ávila, Edvande Xavier Dos Santos Filho, Renato Ivan de Ávila, Aline Carvalho Batista, Simone Gonçalves Fonseca, Eliana Martins Lima, Ricardo Neves Marreto, Elismauro Francisco de Mendonça, Marize Campos Valadares

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla Caroline Cunha BastosLaboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique Marcelino de ÁvilaLaboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Edvande Xavier Dos Santos FilhoLaboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Renato Ivan de ÁvilaLaboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Aline Carvalho BatistaLaboratório de Patologia Bucal, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Simone Gonçalves FonsecaInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Eliana Martins LimaLaboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Ricardo Neves MarretoLaboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Elismauro Francisco de MendonçaLaboratório de Patologia Bucal, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Marize Campos ValadaresLaboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular-FarmaTec, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral studies towards the development of an effective treatment for intestinal mucositis have been reported, since this condition represents a major problem in clinical oncology practice due to cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. However standardized protocols and universally accepted treatment options are yet to be established.

objectivesGiven above, this study evaluated the protective effects of a mucoadhesive formulation containing both

resultsAs expected, animals only treated with 5-FU (200 mg/kg) showed a significant reduction of 60.3 and 42.4% in villi and crypts size, respectively, when compared to control. On the other hand, the proposed therapeutic/prophylactic treatment with mucoadhesive formulations managed to reduce histopathologic changes in mice bearing mucositis, especially at 125 mg/kg BP + 15 mg/kg CL dose. The formulation promoted an increase of 275.5% and 148.7% for villi and crypts size, respectively. Moreover, chemotherapy-related weight loss was reduced by 7.4% following the treatment. In addition, an increase of 10 and 30.5% in red and white blood cells was observed when compared to 5-FU group. Furthermore, treatments with the mucoadhesive formulation containing BP/CL up modulated Ki-67 and Bcl-2 expression while reduced pro-apoptotic regulator Bax. The formulation also modulated inflammatory response triggered by 5-FU through reduction of 68% of myeloperoxidase activity and a 4-fold increase in anti-inflammatory IL-10 levels. In parallel, the oxidative stress

conclusionsThis study showed an interesting potential of the mucoadhesive formulation of BP/CL for the treatment of 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis. Given the perspectives for the development of a new medicine, clinical studies are in progress to better understand the protective effects of this innovative formulation in treating mucositis.

Indexed as

Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae)Curcuma longa L. (Zingiberaceae)Intestinal damageMucoadhesionMucositisTri-block copolymer

Identifiers

PMID28959548
PMCPMC5615376
OpenAlexW2198955977

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.