Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28959591›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2016

Lack of adverse health effects following 30-weeks of dietary exposure to acrylamide at low doses in male F344 rats.

Jayadev Raju, Andrea Kocmarek, Jennifer Roberts, Marnie Taylor, Dominique Patry, Emily Chomyshyn, Don Caldwell, Gerard Cooke, Rekha Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jayadev RajuRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea KocmarekRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer RobertsRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Marnie TaylorRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dominique PatryScientific Services Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Emily ChomyshynScientific Services Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Don CaldwellScientific Services Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gerard CookeRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rekha MehtaRegulatory Toxicology Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Health Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the health hazards following exposure to food-borne acrylamide, especially at low levels typified by human diets, is an ongoing food safety issue. We recently published results from a study that aimed to understand the effects of acrylamide short-term exposure at doses known to cause tumors in rodents, demonstrating that a number of key toxicological end points were altered by acrylamide exposure. Additionally, we reported that at much lower doses for 30 weeks of exposure, dietary acrylamide was 'not a complete carcinogen' to the colon in an organ-specific rodent carcinogenesis study but acted as a co-carcinogen along with azoxymethane (AOM, a colon-specific carcinogen). Here, we present toxicological data from a sub-set of this long-term exposure study from animals that received saline (instead of AOM). Briefly, male F344 rats were randomized to receive acrylamide at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg diet (∼0.02, 0.04, and 0.09 mg/kg BW/day, respectively) or no acrylamide (control), for 30 weeks; all rats were then euthanized and their tissues harvested and processed for toxicological evaluation. We report that at the doses tested, acrylamide did not cause any changes in general well-being, body weight or food intake. Similarly, acrylamide did not cause any biologically relevant change in parameters associated with immunophenotyping, serum biochemistry or hematology. Histopathology assessment of tissues showed no changes except in the testis, where non-specific mild lesions were observed in all the groups, inclusive of the controls. No neuropathological effects of acrylamide were observed in the brain and nerve tissues. Together, these results suggest that acrylamide administered to rats through the diet at low doses for 30 weeks did not cause any toxicologically relevant changes. Given that the doses of acrylamide in the current study are low and are comparable to human dietary exposure, this null-effect study provides data that contribute to the body of scientific evidence relevant to understanding the health effects of acrylamide.

Indexed as

AcrylamideClinical biochemistryDietF344 ratsHematologyPathologyTestosteroneToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28959591
PMCPMC5616078
OpenAlexW2517616339

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.