ArticleRSC advances2017
Selective Adhesive Cell Capture without Molecular Specificity: New Surfaces Exploiting Nanoscopic Polycationic Features as Discrete Adhesive Units.
Article in RSC advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accessing the DNA in Breast Tissue: Adhesive Cell Capture from Flow onto Fibers of Cellulose Papers.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Surfaces that Adhesively Discriminate Breast Epithelial Cell Lines and Lymphocytes in Buffer and Human Breast Milk.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work explored how molecularly non-specific polycationic nanoscale features on a collecting surface control kinetic and selectivity aspects of mammalian cell capture. Key principles for selective collector design were demonstrated by comparing the capture of two closely related breast cancer cell lines: MCF-7 and TMX2-28. TMX2-28 is a tamoxifen-selected clone of MCF-7. The collector was a silica surface, negatively-charged at pH 7.4, containing isolated molecules (~ 8 nm diameter) of the cationic polymer, poly(dimethyl-aminoethylmethacrylate), pDMAEMA. Important in this work is the non-selective nature of the pDMAEMA interactions with cells: pDMAEMA generally adheres negatively charged particles and cells in solution. We show here that selectivity towards cells results from collector design: this includes competition between repulsive interactions involving the negative silica and attractions to the immobilized pDMAEMA molecules, the random pDMAEMA arrangement on the surface, and the concentration of positive charge in the vicinity of the adsorbed pDMAEMA chains. The latter act as nanoscopic cationic surface patches, each weakly attracted to negatively-charged cells. Collecting surfaces engineered with an appropriate amount pDMAEMA, exposed to mixtures of MCF-7 and TMX2-28 cells preferentially captured TMX2-28 with a selectivity of 2.5. (This means that the ratio of TMX2-28 to MCF cells on the surface was 2.5 times their compositional ratio in free solution.) The ionic strength-dependence of cell capture was shown to be similar to that of silica microparticles on the same surfaces. This suggests that the mechanism of selective cell capture involves nanoscopic differences in the contact areas of the cells with the collector, allowing discrimination of closely related cell line-based small scale features of the cell surface. This work demonstrated that even without molecular specificity, selectivity for physical cell attributes produces adhesive discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.