Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017479›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Markus D Jakobsen, Emil Sundstrup, Mikkel Brandt, Lars L Andersen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01921764 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of Physical Exercise at the Workplace (IRMA08) - Healthcare Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, DenmarkRan2013 to 2014Enrolled200ConditionsMusculoskeletal DisordersArmsWorkplace physical exercise, Home physical exercise
NCT05966805 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Impact of a 12-week Worksite Exercise Training Intervention on Mental, Metabolic, Physical, Spiritual, and Occupational Well-being Among Acute Care Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Mixed Methods Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2023 to 2025Enrolled21ConditionsPsychological WellnessArmsExercise training group, Wait-List Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychosocial determinants of physical activity among workers: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus D JakobsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. markusdue@gmail.com.
Emil SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel BrandtNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars L AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers.

methodsA total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0-100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0-100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0-100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0-10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0-10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up.

resultsVitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p < 0.05) in spite of increased work pace (p < 0.05). Work- and leisure disability, emotional demands, influence at work, sense of community, social support and mental health remained unchanged. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3 to 10] for vitality, -0.8 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3] for control of pain and -0.9 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.5] for concern about pain, respectively.

conclusionsPerforming physical exercise together with colleagues during working hours was more effective than home-based exercise in improving vitality and concern and control of pain among healthcare workers. These benefits occurred in spite of increased work pace.

trial registrationNCT01921764 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Registered 10 August 2013.

Indexed as

Occupational Health ServicesAdultCluster AnalysisExercise TherapyFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansPersonnel, HospitalTreatment OutcomeWorkplaceBiopsychosocialMental healthMusculoskeletal disordersOccupational healthPainPatient handlingSocial capitalStrength trainingVitality

Identifiers

PMID29017479
PMCPMC5635526
OpenAlexW2762076696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.