Evidence mapPaperPMID 29018341Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2017

Recent Development of Hydrogen Sulfide Releasing/Stimulating Reagents and Their Potential Applications in Cancer and Glycometabolic Disorders.

Chun-Tao Yang, Li Chen, Shi Xu, Jacob J Day, Xiang Li, Ming Xian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Advances in Molecular Research on Hydrogen Sulfide (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Significance of GSH and HRedox report : communications in free radical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Hidden Role of Hydrogen Sulfide Metabolism in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of HAdvances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Role of hydrogen sulfide donors in cancer development and progression.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chun-Tao YangAffiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Degradation in School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li ChenAffiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Degradation in School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shi XuDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Jacob J DayDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Xiang LiAffiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Degradation in School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming XianDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNWashington State University · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an important endogenous gaseous signaling molecule, hydrogen sulfide (H

Indexed as

cancerdonorglucose metabolismhydrogen sulfide

Identifiers

PMID29018341
PMCPMC5623001
OpenAlexW2760795292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.