Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29020132›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2018

The Relationship Between Occupational Standing and Sitting and Incident Heart Disease Over a 12-Year Period in Ontario, Canada.

Peter Smith, Huiting Ma, Richard H Glazier, Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet, Cameron Mustard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Standing up against office sitting: A study protocol.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. The physical activity health paradox: what is it, why might it happen, and where to go from here?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Is Sitting Really the New Smoking? Health of North American Workers Exposed to Prolonged Static Standing.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter SmithInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Huiting MaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard H GlazierDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mahée Gilbert-OuimetInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cameron MustardInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Work & Health · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CA

Funding

CIHR 310898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a growing body of research is examining the impacts of prolonged occupational sitting on cardiovascular and other health risk factors, relatively little work has examined the effects of occupational standing. The objectives of this paper were to examine the relationship between occupations that require predominantly sitting and those that require predominantly standing and incident heart disease. A prospective cohort study combining responses to a population health survey with administrative health-care records, linked at the individual level, was conducted in Ontario, Canada. The sample included 7,320 employed labor-market participants (50% male) working 15 hours a week or more and free of heart disease at baseline. Incident heart disease was assessed using administrative records over an approximately 12-year follow-up period (2003-2015). Models adjusted for a wide range of potential confounding factors. Occupations involving predominantly standing were associated with an approximately 2-fold risk of heart disease compared with occupations involving predominantly sitting. This association was robust to adjustment for other health, sociodemographic, and work variables. Cardiovascular risk associated with occupations that involve combinations of sitting, standing, and walking differed for men and women, with these occupations associated with lower cardiovascular risk estimates among men but elevated risk estimates among women.

Indexed as

Sitting PositionStanding PositionAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHeart DiseasesHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupationsOntarioProspective Studiesadministrative dataCanadaheart diseasesoccupational exposuresitting positionstanding position

Identifiers

PMID29020132
PMCPMC5860480
OpenAlexW3140135624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.