Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29023490›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Network modeling of kinase inhibitor polypharmacology reveals pathways targeted in chemical screens.

Oana Ursu, Sara J C Gosline, Neil Beeharry, Lauren Fink, Vikram Bhattacharjee, Shao-Shan Carol Huang, Yan Zhou, Tim Yen, Ernest Fraenkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oana UrsuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sara J C GoslineDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Neil BeeharryFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Lauren FinkCancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Vikram BhattacharjeeFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shao-Shan Carol HuangPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Yan ZhouFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Tim YenFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ernest FraenkelDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Embryonal Brain Tumor NetworksU01CA184898 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FRAENKEL, ERNEST, MESIROV, JILL P. · 2014 to 2019
$3.6M
A Systems Biology Approach to Reveal Huntington's Disease MechanismsR01GM089903 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FRAENKEL, ERNEST · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Characterization of Drug Survival by Pancreatic Cancer Cells in vitro and in vivoR21CA182651 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI YEN, TIMOTHY · 2014 to 2015
$427k
TDG as a novel target to enhance gemcitabine killing of pancreatic cancer cellsR21CA191956 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI BELLACOSA, ALFONSO, YEN, TIMOTHY · 2015 to 2016
$427k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182651NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191956NCI NIH HHS U01 CA184898NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecule screens are widely used to prioritize pharmaceutical development. However, determining the pathways targeted by these molecules is challenging, since the compounds are often promiscuous. We present a network strategy that takes into account the polypharmacology of small molecules in order to generate hypotheses for their broader mode of action. We report a screen for kinase inhibitors that increase the efficacy of gemcitabine, the first-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Eight kinase inhibitors emerge that are known to affect 201 kinases, of which only three kinases have been previously identified as modifiers of gemcitabine toxicity. In this work, we use the SAMNet algorithm to identify pathways linking these kinases and genetic modifiers of gemcitabine toxicity with transcriptional and epigenetic changes induced by gemcitabine that we measure using DNaseI-seq and RNA-seq. SAMNet uses a constrained optimization algorithm to connect genes from these complementary datasets through a small set of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. The resulting network recapitulates known pathways including DNA repair, cell proliferation and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. We use the network to predict genes with important roles in the gemcitabine response, including six that have already been shown to modify gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer and ten novel candidates. Our work reveals the important role of polypharmacology in the activity of these chemosensitizing agents.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticModels, BiologicalPancreatic NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDeoxycytidineDNA RepairEpigenesis, GeneticEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGemcitabineHumansTranscription, GeneticDeoxycytidineGemcitabineProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29023490
PMCPMC5638242
OpenAlexW2760971851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.