Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028908›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2018

Negative Affect Is Associated With Higher Risk of Incident Cognitive Impairment in Nondepressed Postmenopausal Women.

Laura E Korthauer, Joseph Goveas, Mark A Espeland, Sally A Shumaker, Katelyn R Garcia, Hilary Tindle, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, Kaycee M Sink, Leslie Vaughan, Stephen R Rapp and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Correlations between Dementia and Loneliness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Loneliness and Risk of Dementia.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura E KorthauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Joseph GoveasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Mark A EspelandDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Sally A ShumakerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Katelyn R GarciaDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Hilary TindleDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Elena Salmoirago-BlotcherDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kaycee M SinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Leslie VaughanDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Stephen R RappDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Susan M ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ira DriscollDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Funding

Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAPP, STEPHEN R · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
Women's Health Initiative Suite of Studies - Extension StudyZIAAG000190 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI RESNICK, SUSAN · 2009 to 2024
$1.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) reflect subjective emotional experiences. Although related to depression and anxiety, these dimensions are distinct constructs representing affective states and patterns. Prior studies suggest that elevated depressive symptoms are associated with risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and probable dementia, but whether affective states are associated with cognitive impairment is still unknown. The present study examined relationships between baseline affective states and cognitive impairment (MCI, probable dementia) in nondepressed women. Method: Baseline PA and NA were assessed in postmenopausal women (N = 2,137; mean age = 73.8 years) from the Women's Health Initiative Study of Cognitive Aging (WHISCA) using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Women were followed annually for an average of 11.3 years; those with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline were excluded. Results: Higher NA was associated with a higher risk of MCI and probable dementia, even after adjusting for important covariates including age, education, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and cardiovascular risk factors, global cognition, and hormone therapy assignment at baseline. PA was not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusions: We present the first evidence to date that greater NA, even in the absence of elevated depressive symptoms, is associated with higher risk of MCI and dementia. This suggests that NA may be an important, measureable and potentially modifiable risk factor for age-related cognitive decline.

Indexed as

AffectPostmenopauseAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29028908
PMCPMC5861908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.