ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017
Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the correlation between training modalities and recovery stages in poststroke robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Quantifying Quality of Reaching Movements Longitudinally Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2022Pooled it
- Smoothness metrics for reaching performance after stroke. Part 1: which one to choose?Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Pooled it
- Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- IMU-based workspace area as a promising complementary tool to assess upper limb function in Neuromuscular diseases: A one-year follow-up.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Older Adult Movement Assessment Through Rehabilitation Software for Upper Limb Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Performance-Based Robotic Training in Individuals with Subacute Stroke: Differences between Responders and Non-Responders.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Various Smoothness Metrics for Upper Limb Movements in Middle-Aged Healthy Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of stretch reflex synergies in the upper limb using principal component analysis (PCA).PloS one · 2023Article
- Application of Multi-Dimensional Intelligent Visual Quantitative Assessment System to Evaluate Hand Function Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Using Robot-Based Variables during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Training in Subacute Stroke Patients to Quantify Treatment Dose.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of Dose of Combined Conventional and Robotic Therapy on Upper Limb Motor Impairments and Costs in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Recovery of arm function during acute to chronic stage of stroke quantified by kinematics.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Principal Components Analysis Using Data Collected From Healthy Individuals on Two Robotic Assessment Platforms Yields Similar Behavioral Patterns.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Can kinematic parameters of 3D reach-to-target movements be used as a proxy for clinical outcome measures in chronic stroke rehabilitation? An exploratory study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Whole Brain White Matter Microstructure and Upper Limb Function: Longitudinal Changes in Fractional Anisotropy and Axial Diffusivity in Post-Stroke Patients.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2019Article
- Kinematic Parameters for Tracking Patient Progress during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study on Subacute Stroke Subjects.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen exploring changes in upper limb kinematics and motor impairment associated with motor recovery in subacute post stroke during intensive therapies involving robot-assisted training, it is not known whether trained joints improve before non-trained joints and whether target reaching capacity improves before movement accuracy.
methodsTwenty-two subacute stroke patients (mean delay post-stroke at program onset 63 ± 29 days, M2) underwent 50 ± 17 (mean ± SD) 45-min sessions of robot-assisted (InMotion™) shoulder/elbow training over 3 months, in addition to conventional occupational therapy. Monthly evaluations (M2 to M5) included Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM), with subscores per joint, and four robot-based kinematic measures: mean target distance covered, mean velocity, direction accuracy (inverse of root mean square error from straight line) and movement smoothness (inverse of mean number of zero-crossings in the velocity profile). We assessed delays to reach statistically significant improvement for each outcome measure.
resultsAt M5, all clinical and kinematic parameters had markedly improved: Fugl-Meyer, +65% (median); distance covered, +87%; mean velocity, +101%; accuracy, +134%; and smoothness, +96%. Delays to reach statistical significance were M3 for the shoulder/elbow Fugl-Meyer subscore (+43%), M4 for the hand (+80%) and M5 for the wrist (+133%) subscores. For kinematic parameters, delays to significant improvements were M3 for distance (+68%), velocity (+65%) and smoothness (+50%), and M5 for accuracy (+134%).
conclusionsAn intensive rehabilitation program combining robot-assisted shoulder/elbow training and conventional occupational therapy was associated with improvement in shoulder and elbow movements first, which suggests focal behavior-related brain plasticity. Findings also suggested that recovery of movement quantity related parameters (range of motion, velocity and smoothness) might precede that of movement quality (accuracy).
trial registrationEudraCT 2016-005121-36 . Date of Registration: 2016-12-20. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 2009-11-24 (retrospective data).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.