Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29034102›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2017

New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis.

Mark P Jensen, Graham A Jamieson, Antoine Lutz, Giuliana Mazzoni, William J McGeown, Enrica L Santarcangelo, Athena Demertzi, Vilfredo De Pascalis, Éva I Bányai, Christian Rominger and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03568227 (Multimodal Investigation of Distinct Hypnotic States - A Resting-State fMRI Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03568227 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Investigation of Distinct Hypnotic States - A Resting-State fMRI Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMike BrueggerRan2018 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsHypnosisArmsHypnosis, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sensory stimulations potentializing digital therapeutics pain control.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Graham A JamiesonSchool of Behavioural, Cognitive, and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Antoine LutzLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France.
Giuliana MazzoniSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
William J McGeownSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Enrica L SantarcangeloDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Athena DemertziInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France and Coma Science Group, GIGA Research, University and University hospital of Liège, Belgium.
Vilfredo De PascalisDepartment of Psychology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Éva I BányaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Christian RomingerInstitut für Psychologie, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Patrik VuilleumierDepartment of Neuroscience, Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marie-Elisabeth FaymonvilleDepartment of Algology - Palliative Care, University Hospital of Liege, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Devin B TerhuneDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FREötvös Loránd University · HUGoldsmiths University of London · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of New England · AUUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Strathclyde · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Hypnosis and Meditation for Pain Management in Veterans: Efficacy and MechanismsR01AT008336 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENSEN, MARK P, WILLIAMS, RHONDA · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Psychological Treatment of Disability-Related Pain: Efficacy and MechanismsR01HD070973 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENSEN, MARK P · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008336NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes key advances in hypnosis research during the past two decades, including (i) clinical research supporting the efficacy of hypnosis for managing a number of clinical symptoms and conditions, (ii) research supporting the role of various divisions in the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in hypnotic responding, and (iii) an emerging finding that high hypnotic suggestibility is associated with atypical brain connectivity profiles. Key recommendations for a research agenda for the next decade include the recommendations that (i) laboratory hypnosis researchers should strongly consider how they assess hypnotic suggestibility in their studies, (ii) inclusion of study participants who score in the middle range of hypnotic suggestibility, and (iii) use of expanding research designs that more clearly delineate the roles of inductions and specific suggestions. Finally, we make two specific suggestions for helping to move the field forward including (i) the use of data sharing and (ii) redirecting resources away from contrasting state and nonstate positions toward studying (a) the efficacy of hypnotic treatments for clinical conditions influenced by central nervous system processes and (b) the neurophysiological underpinnings of hypnotic phenomena. As we learn more about the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying hypnosis and suggestion, we will strengthen our knowledge of both basic brain functions and a host of different psychological functions.

Indexed as

consciousnesshypnosishypnotic suggestibilityhypnotizability

Identifiers

PMID29034102
PMCPMC5635845
OpenAlexW2605965249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.