Evidence mapPaperPMID 29035675Full record

ReviewmAbs2018

Practical considerations in clinical strategy to support the development of injectable drug-device combination products for biologics.

Zhaoyang Li, Rachael Easton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01163617 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Injection Time and Usability of the Physiolis Syringe and Autoinjector in Injection-Experienced Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01163617 phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Injection Time and Usability of the Physiolis Syringe and Autoinjector in Injection-Experienced Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Ran2010 to 2010Enrolled85ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsAdalimumab delivered in current syringe, Adalimumab delivered in Physiolis syringe, Adalimumab delivered in current autoinjector, Adalimumab delivered in Physiolis autoinjector
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhaoyang Lia Sanofi, Translational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology , Cambridge , MA , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-8498
Rachael Eastonb Sanofi, Translational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology , 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater , NJ , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of an injectable drug-device combination (DDC) product for biologics is an intricate and evolving process that requires substantial investments of time and money. Consequently, the commercial dosage form(s) or presentation(s) are often not ready when pivotal trials commence, and it is common to have drug product changes (manufacturing process or presentation) during clinical development. A scientifically sound and robust bridging strategy is required in order to introduce these changes into the clinic safely. There is currently no single developmental paradigm, but a risk-based hierarchical approach has been well accepted. The rigor required of a bridging package depends on the level of risk associated with the changes. Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparability or outcome studies are only required when important changes occur at a late stage. Moreover, an injectable DDC needs to be user-centric, and usability assessment in real-world clinical settings may be required to support the approval of a DDC. In this review, we discuss the common issues during the manufacturing process and presentation development of an injectable DDC and practical considerations in establishing a clinical strategy to address these issues, including key elements of clinical studies. We also analyze the current practice in the industry and review relevant and status of regulatory guidance in the DDC field.

Indexed as

Device ApprovalDrug PackagingAnimalsBiological ProductsConsumer Product SafetyDosage FormsDrug ApprovalDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignHumansInjectionsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiological ProductsDosage Formsbiologicsclinical developmentdrug-device combinationinjectable biologicsmonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID29035675
PMCPMC5800388

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.