ReviewmAbs2018
Practical considerations in clinical strategy to support the development of injectable drug-device combination products for biologics.
Review in mAbs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01163617 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Injection Time and Usability of the Physiolis Syringe and Autoinjector in Injection-Experienced Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Injection Time and Usability of the Physiolis Syringe and Autoinjector in Injection-Experienced Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methodologies for generating and evaluating clinical and performance evidence for high-risk and innovative medical devices andFrontiers in medical technology · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.The AAPS journal · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetic Bridging Between an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe Following Subcutaneous Administration of Mirikizumab in Healthy Participants.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- A Risk-Based Assessment for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Comparability Requirements of Biologic-Device Combination Products Administered by Subcutaneous Injection.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- Postmarketing Reports of Incomplete Dosing-Related Complications with Self-Injected PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Descriptive Study and Disproportionality Analysis.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Biopharmaceutical Products Listed in the FDA's Purple Book.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Review
- Use of subcutaneous tocilizumab to prepare intravenous solutions for COVID-19 emergency shortage: Comparative analytical study of physicochemical quality attributes.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of an injectable drug-device combination (DDC) product for biologics is an intricate and evolving process that requires substantial investments of time and money. Consequently, the commercial dosage form(s) or presentation(s) are often not ready when pivotal trials commence, and it is common to have drug product changes (manufacturing process or presentation) during clinical development. A scientifically sound and robust bridging strategy is required in order to introduce these changes into the clinic safely. There is currently no single developmental paradigm, but a risk-based hierarchical approach has been well accepted. The rigor required of a bridging package depends on the level of risk associated with the changes. Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparability or outcome studies are only required when important changes occur at a late stage. Moreover, an injectable DDC needs to be user-centric, and usability assessment in real-world clinical settings may be required to support the approval of a DDC. In this review, we discuss the common issues during the manufacturing process and presentation development of an injectable DDC and practical considerations in establishing a clinical strategy to address these issues, including key elements of clinical studies. We also analyze the current practice in the industry and review relevant and status of regulatory guidance in the DDC field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.