Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29047334›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

A Support Vector Machine based method to distinguish long non-coding RNAs from protein coding transcripts.

Hugo W Schneider, Taina Raiol, Marcelo M Brigido, Maria Emilia M T Walter, Peter F Stadler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The computational approaches of lncRNA identification based on coding potential:Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo W SchneiderDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, ICC Central, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Campus Universitario Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, CEP: 70910-900, Brasilia, Brazil. hugowschneider@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-8566
Taina RaiolGerência Regional de Brasilia (GEREB), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av. L3 Norte, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Gleba A, Asa Norte, CEP: 70910-900, Brasília, Brazil.
Marcelo M BrigidoLaboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Brasilia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Campus Universitario Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, CEP: 70910-900, Brasilia, Brazil.
Maria Emilia M T WalterDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, ICC Central, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Campus Universitario Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, CEP: 70910-900, Brasilia, Brazil.
Peter F StadlerBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Hartelstrasse 16-18, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.
Universidade de Brasília · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRLeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, a rapidly increasing number of RNA transcripts has been generated by thousands of sequencing projects around the world, creating enormous volumes of transcript data to be analyzed. An important problem to be addressed when analyzing this data is distinguishing between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and protein coding transcripts (PCTs). Thus, we present a Support Vector Machine (SVM) based method to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs, using features based on frequencies of nucleotide patterns and ORF lengths, in transcripts.

methodsThe proposed method is based on SVM and uses the first ORF relative length and frequencies of nucleotide patterns selected by PCA as features. FASTA files were used as input to calculate all possible features. These features were divided in two sets: (i) 336 frequencies of nucleotide patterns; and (ii) 4 features derived from ORFs. PCA were applied to the first set to identify 6 groups of frequencies that could most contribute to the distinction. Twenty-four experiments using the 6 groups from the first set and the features from the second set where built to create the best model to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs.

resultsThis method was trained and tested with human (Homo sapiens), mouse (Mus musculus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) data, achieving 98.21%, 98.03% and 96.09%, accuracy, respectively. Our method was compared to other tools available in the literature (CPAT, CPC, iSeeRNA, lncRNApred, lncRScan-SVM and FEELnc), and showed an improvement in accuracy by ≈3.00%. In addition, to validate our model, the mouse data was classified with the human model, and vice-versa, achieving ≈97.80% accuracy in both cases, showing that the model is not overfit. The SVM models were validated with data from rat (Rattus norvegicus), pig (Sus scrofa) and fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), and obtained more than 84.00% accuracy in all these organisms. Our results also showed that 81.2% of human pseudogenes and 91.7% of mouse pseudogenes were classified as non-coding. Moreover, our method was capable of re-annotating two uncharacterized sequences of Swiss-Prot database with high probability of being lncRNAs. Finally, in order to use the method to annotate transcripts derived from RNA-seq, previously identified lncRNAs of human, gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) were analyzed, having successfully classified 98.62%, 80.8% and 91.9%, respectively.

conclusionsThe SVM method proposed in this work presents high performance to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs, as shown in the results. To build the model, besides using features known in the literature regarding ORFs, we used PCA to identify features among nucleotide pattern frequencies that contribute the most in distinguishing lncRNAs from PCTs, in reference data sets. Interestingly, models created with two evolutionary distant species could distinguish lncRNAs of even more distant species.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedZebrafishRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedlncRNA prediction with nucleotide pattern frequencies and ORF lengthLong non-coding RNA (lncRNA)Machine learningPrincipal component analysis (PCA)Support vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID29047334
PMCPMC5648457
OpenAlexW2765094054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.