ArticleBMC genomics2017
A Support Vector Machine based method to distinguish long non-coding RNAs from protein coding transcripts.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long non-coding RNA transcripts in crucian carp brain - annotation and expression patterns in anoxia and reoxygenation.RNA biology · 2026Article
- Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026Review
- LncPlankton: a comprehensive database of candidate lncRNAs from marine microbial eukaryotes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- MFPINC: prediction of plant ncRNAs based on multi-source feature fusion.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Long non-coding RNAs mediate fish gene expression in response to ocean acidification.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Linking discoveries, mechanisms, and technologies to develop a clearer perspective on plant long noncoding RNAs.The Plant cell · 2023Review
- A large-scale benchmark study of tools for the classification of protein-coding and non-coding RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- PINC: A Tool for Non-Coding RNA Identification in Plants Based on an Automated Machine Learning Framework.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Deep learning tools are top performers in long non-coding RNA prediction.Briefings in functional genomics · 2022Article
- Advances in Computational Methodologies for Classification and Sub-Cellular Locality Prediction of Non-Coding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- CodAn: predictive models for precise identification of coding regions in eukaryotic transcripts.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- IIMLP: integrated information-entropy-based method for LncRNA prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- PlncRNA-HDeep: plant long noncoding RNA prediction using hybrid deep learning based on two encoding styles.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- A systematic evaluation of bioinformatics tools for identification of long noncoding RNAs.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Predicting Long non-coding RNAs through feature ensemble learning.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- The computational approaches of lncRNA identification based on coding potential:Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Article
- CPPred: coding potential prediction based on the global description of RNA sequence.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, a rapidly increasing number of RNA transcripts has been generated by thousands of sequencing projects around the world, creating enormous volumes of transcript data to be analyzed. An important problem to be addressed when analyzing this data is distinguishing between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and protein coding transcripts (PCTs). Thus, we present a Support Vector Machine (SVM) based method to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs, using features based on frequencies of nucleotide patterns and ORF lengths, in transcripts.
methodsThe proposed method is based on SVM and uses the first ORF relative length and frequencies of nucleotide patterns selected by PCA as features. FASTA files were used as input to calculate all possible features. These features were divided in two sets: (i) 336 frequencies of nucleotide patterns; and (ii) 4 features derived from ORFs. PCA were applied to the first set to identify 6 groups of frequencies that could most contribute to the distinction. Twenty-four experiments using the 6 groups from the first set and the features from the second set where built to create the best model to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs.
resultsThis method was trained and tested with human (Homo sapiens), mouse (Mus musculus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) data, achieving 98.21%, 98.03% and 96.09%, accuracy, respectively. Our method was compared to other tools available in the literature (CPAT, CPC, iSeeRNA, lncRNApred, lncRScan-SVM and FEELnc), and showed an improvement in accuracy by ≈3.00%. In addition, to validate our model, the mouse data was classified with the human model, and vice-versa, achieving ≈97.80% accuracy in both cases, showing that the model is not overfit. The SVM models were validated with data from rat (Rattus norvegicus), pig (Sus scrofa) and fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), and obtained more than 84.00% accuracy in all these organisms. Our results also showed that 81.2% of human pseudogenes and 91.7% of mouse pseudogenes were classified as non-coding. Moreover, our method was capable of re-annotating two uncharacterized sequences of Swiss-Prot database with high probability of being lncRNAs. Finally, in order to use the method to annotate transcripts derived from RNA-seq, previously identified lncRNAs of human, gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) were analyzed, having successfully classified 98.62%, 80.8% and 91.9%, respectively.
conclusionsThe SVM method proposed in this work presents high performance to distinguish lncRNAs from PCTs, as shown in the results. To build the model, besides using features known in the literature regarding ORFs, we used PCA to identify features among nucleotide pattern frequencies that contribute the most in distinguishing lncRNAs from PCTs, in reference data sets. Interestingly, models created with two evolutionary distant species could distinguish lncRNAs of even more distant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.