Evidence mapPaperPMID 29047372Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2017

Effectiveness and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes in older adults: a systematic review and development of recommendations to reduce inappropriate prescribing.

Gisela Schott, Yolanda V Martinez, R Erandie Ediriweera de Silva, Anna Renom-Guiteras, Anna Vögele, David Reeves, Ilkka Kunnamo, Minna Marttila-Vaara, Andreas Sönnichsen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Asian Best Practices for Care of Diabetes in Elderly (ABCDE).The review of diabetic studies : RDS · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Gisela SchottDrug Commission of the German Medical Association, Berlin, Germany. gisela.schott@akdae.de.
Yolanda V MartinezNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
R Erandie Ediriweera de SilvaNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Anna Renom-GuiterasInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Anna VögeleSouth Tyrolean Academy of General Practice, Bolzano, Italy.
David ReevesNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Ilkka KunnamoDuodecim Medical Publications Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.
Minna Marttila-VaaraDuodecim Medical Publications Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.
Andreas SönnichsenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Finnish Medical Society Duodecim · FIUniversity of Manchester · GBEurac Research · ITGerman Medical Association · DEManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBParc de Salut · ESWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventable drug-related hospital admissions can be associated with drugs used in diabetes and the benefits of strict diabetes control may not outweigh the risks, especially in older populations. The aim of this study was to look for evidence on risks and benefits of DPP-4 inhibitors in older adults and to use this evidence to develop recommendations for the electronic decision support tool of the PRIMA-eDS project.

methodsSystematic review using a staged approach which searches for systematic reviews and meta-analyses first, then individual studies only if prior searches were inconclusive. The target population were older people (≥65 years old) with type 2 diabetes. We included studies reporting on the efficacy and/or safety of DPP-4 inhibitors for the management of type 2 diabetes. Studies were included irrespective of DPP-4 inhibitors prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with any other drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The target intervention was DPP-4 inhibitors compared to placebo, no treatment, other drugs to treat type 2 diabetes or a non-pharmacological intervention.

resultsThirty studies (reported in 33 publications) were included: 1 meta-analysis, 17 intervention studies and 12 observational studies. Sixteen studies were focused on older adults and 14 studies reported subgroup analyses in participants ≥65, ≥70, or ≥75 years. Comorbidities were reported by 26 studies and frailty or functional status by one study. There were conflicting findings regarding the effectiveness of DPP-4 inhibitors in older adults. In general, DPP-4 inhibitors showed similar or better safety than placebo and other antidiabetic drugs. However, these safety data are mainly based on short-term outcomes like hypoglycaemia in studies with HbA1c control levels recommended for younger people. One recommendation was developed advising clinicians to reconsider the use of DPP-4 inhibitors for the management of type 2 diabetes in older adults with HbA1c <8.5% because of scarce data on clinically relevant benefits of their use. Twenty-two of the included studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies and authored or co-authored by employees of the sponsor.

conclusionsOther than the surrogate endpoint of improved glycaemic control, data on clinically relevant benefits of DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults is scarce. DPP-4 inhibitors might have a lower risk of hypoglycaemia compared to other antidiabetic drugs but data show conflicting findings for long-term benefits. Further studies are needed that evaluate the risks and benefits of DPP-4 inhibitors for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults, using clinically relevant outcomes and including representative samples of older adults with information on their frailty status and comorbidities. Studies are also needed that are independent of pharmaceutical company involvement.

Indexed as

AgedDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInappropriate PrescribingRisk AdjustmentTreatment OutcomeDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsDipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitorsInappropriate prescribingSystematic reviewType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID29047372
PMCPMC5647559
OpenAlexW2766983721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.