Observational studyModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018
Association between clinicopathological characteristics and RAS mutation in colorectal cancer.
Observational study in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- KRAS mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Genetic Landscape of Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Alterations to Therapeutic Decision Pathways.Cancers · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Detection ofGenes · 2026Article
- KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational profile and association with clinicopathological characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- KRAS Mutation Status in Relation to Clinicopathological Characteristics of Romanian Colorectal Cancer Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Associations of KRAS Mutations and Clinical Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer Patients in Indonesia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Correlation betweenGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of Lynch syndrome, BRAFCancer medicine · 2023Article
- New Developments in Treating RAS-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of RSPO fusion-positive colorectal cancer.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- Regulation of KRAS protein expression by miR-544a and KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism in wild-type KRAS sporadic colon adenocarcinoma.Human cell · 2021Article
- Upregulated NLGN1 predicts poor survival in colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Mutation Status and Prognostic Value of KRAS and BRAF in Southeast Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients: First Report from Southeast of Iran.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and mutational profile of KRAS and NRAS in Tunisian patients with sporadic colorectal cancerTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- New Artificial Intelligence Score and Immune Infiltrates as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer With Brain Metastases.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In colorectal cancer, KRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4) and NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4) mutations are associated with resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, and BRAF mutation is a molecular marker of poor prognosis. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers have well-known distinct clinicopathological characteristics. Comparison of tumors with different RAS status (exons 2, 3, and 4 of KRAS and NRAS) based on their clinicopathological characteristics has never been established. All colorectal cancer patients with RAS and BRAF testing from 2011 to 2015 were included in this observational retrospective study. Patient and tumor characteristics were collected and correlation with RAS and BRAF status was evaluated. A total of 1735 patients with colorectal cancer were included. RAS-mutated colorectal cancers (n=1002), compared with RAS wild-type colorectal cancers (n=733), were significantly associated with male gender, classical adenocarcinoma subtype, well/moderately differentiated tumors, and microsatellite stable phenotype. KRAS codon 13-mutated colorectal cancers (n=171), compared with RAS wild-type colorectal cancers, more frequently presented classical adenocarcinoma subtype and microsatellite stable phenotype. In comparison with other RAS mutations, KRAS exon 3-mutated colorectal cancers (n=23) were associated with mucinous/rare histological subtypes and, most likely to located in the rectum. KRAS exon 4-mutated colorectal cancers (n=33) were more frequently associated with mucinous/rare histological subtypes. There was no significant association between NRAS mutation (n=37) and clinicopathological features. Colorectal cancers are associated with different clinicopathological features according to the type of RAS mutation. Consequently, these particular characteristics must be considered when assessing the prognostic value of RAS status in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.